• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描对桡动脉移植物进行短期评估。

Short-term assessment of radial artery grafts with multidetector computed tomography.

作者信息

Qiao En, Wang Yuetang, Yu Jun, Wang Xu, Luo Xinjin, Wang Wei

机构信息

Structural Heart Disease Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 17;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01465-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-021-01465-3
PMID:33865411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8052742/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical use of the radial artery (RA) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still limited worldwide, although it has been recommended by several guidelines. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is widely used to evaluate graft patency, as invasive coronary angiography could cause potentially serious risks including bleeding, dissection and stroke. This study aims to report the short-term results of the RA in CABG with MDCT.

METHODS

The study population consists of 41 consecutive patients undergoing elective CABG with the RA graft between 2017 to 2018, with MDCT performed to evaluate graft patency during follow-up, and target vessels for the RA were non-left anterior descending coronary arteries with > 70% stenosis.

RESULTS

A total of 150 grafts were assessed by MDCT during follow-up (mean, 8.9 ± 5.1 months). MDCT could clearly show the structure and patency of grafts, even for complex coronary artery revascularization. Graft patency of the left internal mammary artery was 92.9% (39/42), with the RA patency of 84.4% (38/45) and the patency of the saphenous vein graft of 81.1% (30/37). And the RA anastomosed to the left coronary artery system might have better patency than the RA anastomosed to the right coronary artery system (25/29, 86.2% vs 13/16, 81.3%, p = 0.686).

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term patency rate of RA grafts is good, and the RA might be associated with better patency when anastomosed to the left but not the right coronary artery. MDCT could provide excellent visualization of grafts in CABG.

摘要

背景

尽管多项指南推荐使用桡动脉(RA)进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),但其在全球范围内的临床应用仍然有限。多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)被广泛用于评估移植血管通畅情况,因为有创冠状动脉造影可能会导致包括出血、夹层和中风在内的潜在严重风险。本研究旨在报告采用MDCT评估CABG中RA的短期结果。

方法

研究对象为2017年至2018年间连续41例行择期CABG并使用RA移植物的患者,在随访期间进行MDCT以评估移植血管通畅情况,RA的靶血管为狭窄程度>70%的非左前降支冠状动脉。

结果

随访期间,MDCT共评估了150条移植血管(平均8.9±5.1个月)。MDCT能够清晰显示移植血管的结构和通畅情况,即使是对于复杂的冠状动脉血运重建。左乳内动脉移植血管通畅率为92.9%(39/42),RA通畅率为84.4%(38/45),大隐静脉移植血管通畅率为81.1%(30/37)。并且,吻合至左冠状动脉系统的RA可能比吻合至右冠状动脉系统的RA具有更好的通畅率(25/29,86.2%对13/16,81.3%,p=0.686)。

结论

RA移植物的短期通畅率良好,并且当RA吻合至左冠状动脉而非右冠状动脉时,其通畅率可能更高。MDCT能够很好地显示CABG中移植血管的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/8052742/8e7bfc6bbb25/13019_2021_1465_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/8052742/c9e0cdebc2c0/13019_2021_1465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/8052742/8e7bfc6bbb25/13019_2021_1465_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/8052742/c9e0cdebc2c0/13019_2021_1465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/8052742/8e7bfc6bbb25/13019_2021_1465_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term assessment of radial artery grafts with multidetector computed tomography.利用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描对桡动脉移植物进行短期评估。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 17;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01465-3.
2
The no-touch saphenous vein is an excellent alternative conduit to the radial artery 8 years after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术后 8 年,非接触式隐静脉是桡动脉的极佳替代血管:一项随机试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):624-630. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.177. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
3
Midterm follow-up of patients receiving radial artery as coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector-row CT coronary angiography.
Radiol Med. 2007 Jun;112(4):538-49. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0160-6. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
4
Sequential radial artery grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10-year survival and angiography results.多支冠状动脉搭桥手术中的序贯桡动脉移植:10年生存率及血管造影结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.081.
5
Has the in situ right internal thoracic artery been overlooked? An angiographic study of the radial artery, internal thoracic arteries and saphenous vein graft patencies in symptomatic patients.原位右胸廓内动脉是否被忽视了?一项对有症状患者的桡动脉、胸廓内动脉和大隐静脉移植血管通畅情况的血管造影研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 May;27(5):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.027.
6
Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts.接受内乳动脉、桡动脉和隐静脉移植物的患者的管道通畅情况。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0.
7
Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中桡动脉移植物与隐静脉移植物的比较:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 12;305(2):167-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1976.
8
Comparison of patency between radial artery and saphenous vein in a coronary artery bypass grafting post operative with return of the symptoms.冠状动脉搭桥术后出现症状复发时桡动脉与大隐静脉通畅情况的比较
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010 Apr-Jun;25(2):218-23. doi: 10.1590/s0102-76382010000200014.
9
Change of luminal diameter of skeletonized and non-skeletonized radial artery graft at early and late postoperative period.骨骼化与非骨骼化桡动脉移植物术后早期和晚期管腔直径的变化。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Apr;31(4):474-81. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0639-3. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
10
The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.首选非接触式隐静脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术的第二移植物。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;96(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.102. Epub 2013 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of the radial artery after angiography in patients undergoing total arterial coronary revascularization.经造影后桡动脉在全动脉冠状动脉血运重建患者中的应用。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 3;19(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02893-7.
2
Radial artery graft in coronary artery bypass surgery 1 week to 1 year postoperation.冠状动脉搭桥手术中桡动脉移植物在术后1周 至1年的情况。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Dec 30;15(12):6408-6418. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-574. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Calcium-Channel Blocker Therapy on Radial Artery Grafts After Coronary Bypass Surgery.钙通道阻滞剂治疗对冠状动脉旁路手术后桡动脉移植物的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 14;73(18):2299-2306. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.054.
2
Long-term clinical outcome and graft patency of radial artery and saphenous vein grafts in multiple arterial revascularization.多动脉血运重建中桡动脉和隐静脉移植物的长期临床结果和通畅率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;158(2):442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.135. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
Does Radial Artery Harvest for Coronary Surgery Compromise Forearm Blood Flow to 22 Years Post-Operative?
冠状动脉手术取用桡动脉会影响术后22年的前臂血流吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 16;72(16):1981-1982. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.073.
4
Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术中的桡动脉或隐静脉移植物。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2069-2077. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716026. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Operative Outcomes of Multiple-Arterial Versus Single-Arterial Coronary Bypass Grafting.多动脉与单动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术的手术结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr;105(4):1109-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.058. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Radial Artery as a Coronary Artery Bypass Conduit: 20-Year Results.桡动脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术的桥血管:20 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 9;68(6):603-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.062.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts.多排螺旋计算机断层扫描在评估冠状动脉旁路移植术中的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:898-905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.264. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
8
64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: A meta-analysis.64层冠状动脉计算机断层扫描在评估冠状动脉旁路移植血管狭窄中的敏感性和特异性:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;216:52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.156. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
[Evaluation of post-operative flow and diameter changes in brachial and ulnar arteries in coronary artery bypass surgery patients in which the radial artery is used as graft].[对使用桡动脉作为移植物的冠状动脉搭桥手术患者肱动脉和尺动脉术后血流及直径变化的评估]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2015 Oct;43(7):630-6. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2015.62679.
10
Vascular access complications: diagnosis and management.血管通路并发症:诊断与管理
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2013 Apr;15(2):173-87. doi: 10.1007/s11936-013-0227-8.