Leonard Charles E, Bilker Warren B, Brensinger Colleen M, Flockhart David A, Freeman Cristin P, Kasner Scott E, Kimmel Stephen E, Hennessy Sean
From the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (C.E.L., W.B.B., C.M.B., C.P.F., S.E. Kimmel, S.H.), Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training (C.E.L., W.B.B., D.A.F., C.P.F., S.E. Kimmel, S.H.), Department of Psychiatry (W.B.B.), Department of Neurology (S.E. Kasner), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (S.E. Kimmel), and Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics (S.H.), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (D.A.F.).
Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):722-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006866. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
There is controversy and little information about whether individual proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) differentially alter the effectiveness of clopidogrel in reducing ischemic stroke risk. We, therefore, aimed to elucidate the risk of ischemic stroke among concomitant users of clopidogrel and individual PPIs.
We conducted a propensity score-adjusted cohort study of adult new users of clopidogrel, using 1999 to 2009 Medicaid claims from 5 large states. Exposures were defined by prescriptions for esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole-with pantoprazole serving as the referent. The end point was hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke, defined by International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision Clinical Modification codes in the principal position on inpatient claims, within 180 days of concomitant therapy initiation.
Among 325 559 concomitant users of clopidogrel and a PPI, we identified 1667 ischemic strokes for an annual incidence of 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.3-2.5). Adjusted hazard ratios for ischemic stroke versus pantoprazole were 0.98 (0.82-1.17) for esomeprazole; 1.06 (0.92-1.21) for lansoprazole; 0.98 (0.85-1.15) for omeprazole; and 0.85 (0.63-1.13) for rabeprazole.
PPIs of interest did not increase the rate of ischemic stroke among clopidogrel users when compared with pantoprazole, a PPI thought to be devoid of the potential to interact with clopidogrel.
对于各类质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是否会不同程度地改变氯吡格雷降低缺血性中风风险的有效性,存在争议且相关信息较少。因此,我们旨在阐明同时使用氯吡格雷和各类PPI的患者发生缺血性中风的风险。
我们利用来自5个大州的1999年至2009年医疗补助索赔数据,对成年氯吡格雷新使用者进行了倾向评分调整队列研究。暴露因素根据埃索美拉唑、兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑、雷贝拉唑和泮托拉唑的处方定义,以泮托拉唑作为对照。终点为急性缺血性中风住院治疗,根据国际疾病分类第九版临床修订版编码,在同时治疗开始后180天内住院患者主要诊断中确定。
在325559例同时使用氯吡格雷和PPI的患者中,我们确定了1667例缺血性中风,年发病率为2.4%(95%置信区间,2.3 - 2.5)。与泮托拉唑相比,埃索美拉唑缺血性中风的调整后风险比为0.98(0.82 - 1.17);兰索拉唑为1.06(0.92 - 1.21);奥美拉唑为0.98(0.85 - 1.15);雷贝拉唑为0.85(0.63 - 1.13)。
与被认为无与氯吡格雷相互作用可能性的PPI泮托拉唑相比,所关注的PPI在氯吡格雷使用者中并未增加缺血性中风的发生率。