Propensity score methods for confounding control in nonexperimental research.
作者信息
Brookhart M Alan, Wyss Richard, Layton J Bradley, Stürmer Til
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
出版信息
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):604-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000359. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Propensity score methods for confounding control in nonexperimental research.非实验性研究中用于控制混杂因素的倾向得分方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):604-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000359. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
2
Use of angiotensin receptor blockers after angioedema with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.血管性水肿发作后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂时联用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Jul;103(1):83-4. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60151-2.
3
[Cross reactivity between ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers].[血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂之间的交叉反应]
Lakartidningen. 2010;107(7):444.
4
Cutaneous adverse effects of angiotensin-II receptor antagonists.血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂的皮肤不良反应。
Prescrire Int. 2007 Feb;16(87):21.
5
Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂所致血管性水肿病史患者使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂发生血管性水肿的风险：一项荟萃分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Nov;101(5):495-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60288-8.
6
[Iatrogenic angioedema: the role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blockers].[医源性血管性水肿：血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂的作用]
Nephrol Ther. 2007 Jun;3(3):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
7
Valsartan-induced angioedema in a patient on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for years: case report and literature review.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗多年的患者应用缬沙坦后发生血管性水肿：病例报告及文献复习。
Am J Ther. 2012 Nov;19(6):e189-92. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181f28f84.
8
Renin angiotensin system blockers-associated angioedema in the Thai population: analysis from Thai National Pharmacovigilance Database.泰国人群中肾素血管紧张素系统阻滞剂相关血管性水肿：来自泰国国家药物警戒数据库的分析
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2015 Sep;33(3):227-35. doi: 10.12932/AP0556.33.3.2015.
9
[Angioedema due to ACE inhibitors and AT(1) receptor antagonists].[血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和AT(1)受体拮抗剂所致血管性水肿]
Hautarzt. 2006 Sep;57(9):808-10. doi: 10.1007/s00105-005-1046-y.
10
Investigation of angioedema associated with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers.血管性水肿与使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相关性的调查。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jan;98(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60860-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Frailty phenotype state transitions among older adults with a history of cancer and diabetes.有癌症和糖尿病病史的老年人的衰弱表型状态转变。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 14;25(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06309-6.
2
Increased risk of osteoarthritis in persons with spinal cord injury: a population-based longitudinal follow-up study in Taiwan.脊髓损伤患者患骨关节炎风险增加：台湾一项基于人群的纵向随访研究
Spinal Cord. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01112-x.
3
DREAM: A framework for discovering mechanisms underlying AI prediction of protected attributes.DREAM：一种用于发现人工智能对受保护属性预测背后机制的框架。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 21:2024.04.09.24305289. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.09.24305289.
4
An episode-based cost analysis of virtual-first versus in-person-first care to treat common acute conditions among members of a large national payor.一项针对大型全国性医保机构成员中常见急性病的虚拟优先与面对面优先护理的基于事件的成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13154-1.
5
SARS-CoV-2 rebound and post-acute mortality and hospitalization among patients admitted with COVID-19: cohort study.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型的反弹及急性后期死亡率和住院率：队列研究
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 28;16(1):6924. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61737-7.
6
Regular aspirin use, breast tumor characteristics and long-term breast cancer survival.常规使用阿司匹林、乳腺肿瘤特征与乳腺癌长期生存
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;11(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00775-2.
7
The early impacts of an attempt to standardize kidney procurement biopsy practices.标准化肾脏获取活检操作的早期影响。
Am J Transplant. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.06.012.
8
Incorporation of missing indicator with multiple imputation in propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: A simulation study.在具有部分观测协变量的倾向得分分析中通过多重填补纳入缺失指标：一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jul;34(7):1293-1302. doi: 10.1177/09622802251338365. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
9
Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy or Anticoagulation Alone.接受机械血栓切除术或单纯抗凝治疗的肺栓塞患者的预后。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 May 1;4(5):102611. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102611. eCollection 2025 May.
10
Antibiotic Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Nonsevere COVID-19.非重症新冠病毒肺炎住院患者的抗生素治疗
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511499. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11499.
本文引用的文献
1
Confounding control in a nonexperimental study of STAR*D data: logistic regression balanced covariates better than boosted CART.STAR*D 数据的非实验性研究中的混杂控制：逻辑回归平衡协变量优于提升 CART。
Ann Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
2
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and angioedema: anesthetic implications.肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与血管性水肿：麻醉相关影响。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):356-62. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328352dda5.
3
Meta-analysis of randomized trials of angioedema as an adverse event of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.血管性水肿作为肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂不良事件的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Aug 1;110(3):383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.034. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
4
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.调整工具变量对效应估计偏差和精度的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec 1;174(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr364. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
5
The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustration.倾向评分变量选择策略在药物流行病学中的意义：实证说明。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):551-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.2098. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
6
Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.双重稳健估计因果效应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):761-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq439. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
7
Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution--a simulation study.存在未测量混杂时的处理效应：处理倾向评分分布尾部的观测值——一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 1;172(7):843-54. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq198. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
8
Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches.医疗数据库研究中的混杂控制：挑战与潜在方法。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S114-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbebe3.
9
Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.流行病学研究中的过度调整偏倚与不必要的调整
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):488-95. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1.
10
Investigating socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: evidence for selective study participation and selection bias.调查早产中的社会经济差异：选择性研究参与和选择偏倚的证据。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;23(4):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01042.x.
Zotero 插件