Cobran Ewan K, Chen Ronald C, Overman Robert, Meyer Anne-Marie, Kuo Tzy-Mey, O'Brien Jonathon, Sturmer Til, Sheets Nathan C, Goldin Gregg H, Penn Dolly C, Godley Paul A, Carpenter William R
University of Georgia, College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA, USA
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Am J Mens Health. 2016 Sep;10(5):399-407. doi: 10.1177/1557988314568184. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), an innovative treatment option for prostate cancer, has rapidly diffused over the past decade. To inform our understanding of racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and outcomes, this study compared diffusion of IMRT in African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) prostate cancer patients during the early years of IMRT diffusion using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. A retrospective cohort of 947 AA and 10,028 CA patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2002 through 2006, who were treated with either IMRT or non-IMRT as primary treatment within 1 year of diagnoses was constructed. Logistic regression was used to examine potential differences in diffusion of IMRT in AA and CA patients, while adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical covariates. A significantly smaller proportion of AA compared with CA patients received IMRT for localized prostate cancer (45% vs. 53%, p < .0001). Racial differences were apparent in multivariable analysis though did not achieve statistical significance, as time and factors associated with race (socioeconomic, geographic, and tumor related factors) explained the preponderance of variance in use of IMRT. Further research examining improved access to innovative cancer treatment and technologies is essential to reducing racial disparities in cancer care.
调强放射治疗(IMRT)是一种用于前列腺癌的创新治疗选择,在过去十年中迅速普及。为了增进我们对前列腺癌治疗及预后中种族差异的理解,本研究利用监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险链接数据库,比较了IMRT在非裔美国(AA)和高加索裔美国(CA)前列腺癌患者中早期普及情况。构建了一个回顾性队列,纳入了947名AA患者和10,028名CA患者,这些患者在2002年至2006年期间被诊断为局限性前列腺癌,且在确诊后1年内接受了IMRT或非IMRT作为主要治疗。采用逻辑回归分析来检验AA和CA患者在IMRT普及方面的潜在差异,同时对社会经济和临床协变量进行调整。与CA患者相比,接受IMRT治疗局限性前列腺癌的AA患者比例显著更低(45%对53%,p <.0001)。种族差异在多变量分析中很明显,但未达到统计学显著性,因为时间以及与种族相关的因素(社会经济、地理和肿瘤相关因素)解释了IMRT使用差异的主要部分。进一步研究改善获得创新癌症治疗和技术的途径对于减少癌症护理中的种族差异至关重要。