dos Passos Darlise Rodrigues, Gigante Denise Petrucci, Maciel Francine Villela, Matijasevich Alicia
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015 Jan-Mar;33(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rpped.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
: To evaluate differences in children's eating behavior in relation to their nutritional status, gender and age.
: Male and female children aged six to ten years were included. They were recruited from a private school in the city of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, in 2012. Children´s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) subscales were used to assess eating behaviors: Food Responsiveness (FR), Enjoyment of Food (EF), Desire to Drink (DD), Emotional Overeating (EOE), Emotional Undereating (EUE), Satiety Responsiveness (SR), Food Fussiness (FF) and Slowness in Eating (SE). Age-adjusted body mass index (BMI) z-scores were calculated according to the WHO recommendations to assess nutritional status.
: The study sample comprised 335 children aged 87.9±10.4 months and 49.3% had normal weight (n=163), 26% were overweight (n=86), 15% were obese (n=50) and 9.7% were severely obese (n=32). Children with excess weight showed higher scores at the CEBQ subscales associated with "food approach" (FR, EF, DD, EOE, <0.001) and lower scores on two "food avoidance" subscales (SR and SE, <0.001 and =0.003, respectively) compared to normal weight children. Differences in the eating behavior related to gender and age were not found.
: "Food approach" subscales were positively associated to excess weight in children, but no associations with gender and age were found.
评估儿童饮食行为在营养状况、性别和年龄方面的差异。
纳入6至10岁的男童和女童。他们于2012年从巴西南部南里奥格兰德州佩洛塔斯市的一所私立学校招募。使用儿童饮食行为问卷(CEBQ)分量表评估饮食行为:食物反应性(FR)、食物享受度(EF)、饮水欲望(DD)、情绪性暴饮暴食(EOE)、情绪性进食不足(EUE)、饱腹感反应性(SR)、食物挑剔(FF)和进食速度慢(SE)。根据世界卫生组织的建议计算年龄调整后的体重指数(BMI)z评分,以评估营养状况。
研究样本包括335名年龄为87.9±10.4个月的儿童,49.3%体重正常(n = 163),26%超重(n = 86),15%肥胖(n = 50),9.7%严重肥胖(n = 32)。与体重正常的儿童相比,超重儿童在与“食物趋近”相关的CEBQ分量表上得分较高(FR、EF、DD、EOE,<0.001),而在两个“食物回避”分量表上得分较低(SR和SE,分别为<0.001和=0.003)。未发现饮食行为在性别和年龄方面的差异。
“食物趋近”分量表与儿童超重呈正相关,但未发现与性别和年龄有关联。