Nikberg Maziar, Kindler Csaba, Chabok Abbas, Letocha Henry, Shetye Jayant, Smedh Kenneth
1 Department of Surgery, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden 2 Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden 3 Department of Pathology, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden 4 Department of Oncology, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar;58(3):275-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000250.
A positive circumferential resection margin has been associated with a high risk of local recurrence and a decrease in survival in patients who have rectal cancer.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the involvement of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival in a multidisciplinary population-based setting by using tailored oncological therapy and surgery with total mesorectal excision.
Data were collected in a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed. Between 1996 and 2009, 448 patients with rectal cancer underwent a curative bowel resection.
Population-based data were collected at a single institution in the county of Västmanland, Sweden.
Preoperative radiotherapy was delivered to 334 patients (74%); it was delivered to 35 patients (8%) concomitantly with preoperative chemotherapy. In 70 patients (16%), en bloc resections of the prostate and vagina were performed. Intraoperative perforations were seen in 7 patients (1.6%). The mesorectal fascia was assessed as complete in 117/118 cases. In 32 cases (7%), the circumferential resection margin was 1 mm or less. After a median follow-up of 68 months, 5 (1.1%) patients developed a local recurrence; one of them had circumferential resection margin involvement. The 5-year overall survival was 77%. In the multivariate analysis, the circumferential resection margin was not an independent factor for disease-free survival.
Mesorectal fascia was not assessed before 2007. The findings might be explained by a type II error but, from a clinical perspective, enough patients were included to motivate the conclusion of the study.
Circumferential resection margin is an important measurement in rectal cancer pathology, but the correlation to local recurrence is much less than previously stated, probably because of oncological treatment and surgery that respects the mesorectal fascia and, when required, en bloc resections. Circumferential resection margin should not be used as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.
切缘阳性与直肠癌患者局部复发风险高及生存率降低相关。
本研究旨在通过采用个体化肿瘤治疗及全直肠系膜切除术,分析在多学科人群基础上切缘受累情况与局部复发及生存率的关系。
数据收集于前瞻性数据库并进行回顾性分析。1996年至2009年期间,448例直肠癌患者接受了根治性肠切除术。
基于瑞典韦斯特曼兰县单个机构收集人群数据。
334例患者(74%)接受了术前放疗;35例患者(8%)在术前化疗的同时接受了放疗。70例患者(16%)进行了前列腺和阴道整块切除。7例患者(1.6%)术中出现穿孔。117/118例病例中直肠系膜筋膜评估为完整。32例病例(7%)切缘为1毫米或更小。中位随访68个月后,5例患者(1.1%)出现局部复发;其中1例切缘受累。5年总生存率为77%。多因素分析中,切缘不是无病生存的独立因素。
2007年前未评估直肠系膜筋膜。这些发现可能由II类错误解释,但从临床角度看,纳入了足够数量的患者以支持本研究结论。
切缘是直肠癌病理学中的一项重要测量指标,但与局部复发的相关性远低于先前报道,可能是因为尊重直肠系膜筋膜并在必要时进行整块切除的肿瘤治疗和手术。在现代直肠癌多学科管理中,切缘不应作为预后标志物。