Kim Kyeong Eui, Bae Sung Uk, Lee Seung Hyun, Lim Dae-Ro, Ha Heon-Kyun, Kim Jin, Ryu Hyo Seon, Park Soo Yeon, Kang Sung Il, Son Gyung Mo, Lee Soo Young, Kim Chang Hyun, Lee Kyung Ha, Ha Gi Won, Kim Hye Jin, Ji Woong Bae, Kim Woo Ram, Kang Sang Hee, Sung Nak Song, Kim Ji Hoon, Lee Taek-Gu, Kim Myung Jo, Jeong Woon Kyung, Baek Seong Kyu
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University and Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea.
Department of Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Trials. 2025 Jul 28;26(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08847-1.
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard surgical treatment for rectal cancers, despite being a technically challenging procedure due to the straight and rigid nature of the laparoscopic instrument within a narrow bony pelvis. A robotic system with multi-joint instruments, three-dimensional vision, and improved ergonomics was introduced, however it is not yet cost-effective. Recently, several articulating laparoscopic instruments have been developed and introduced as substitutes for multi-joint robotic system instruments. The prospective study aims to demonstrate that the positive rate of circumferential resection margin following laparoscopic surgery with articulated laparoscopic instruments is non-inferior to that of robotic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer.
METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with primary rectal cancer who are treated with low anterior resection using articulated laparoscopic instruments will be included in the study. Participating colorectal surgeons must use articulated laparoscopic instruments at least during TME. We hypothesize that the positive rate of circumferential resection margin after robotic surgery will be 6%, 3 based on the previous studies. A trial with 157 patients contributing to the primary outcome analysis would have 80% power to declare non-inferiority with a 5.2% non-inferiority margin, assuming a 10% dropout rate. To compare laparoscopic TME group and robotic TME group, we adjust for variables such as gender, T stage, N stage, sphincter saving status, and preoperative chemoradiation using propensity score matching. The primary end-point of this study is cicumferential resection margin after surgery.
Based on this study, we hope to demonstrate the efficacy and viability of articulated laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of rectal cancer at a lower cost than robotic surgery.
Clinical Research Information Service KCT0008896. Registered on 15 August 2023.
腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(TME)已成为直肠癌的标准手术治疗方法,尽管由于腹腔镜器械在狭窄骨盆内的笔直和刚性,该手术在技术上具有挑战性。一种具有多关节器械、三维视觉和改进人体工程学的机器人系统已被引入,然而其成本效益尚不高。最近,几种可弯曲腹腔镜器械已被开发并引入,作为多关节机器人系统器械的替代品。这项前瞻性研究旨在证明,在直肠癌治疗中,使用可弯曲腹腔镜器械进行腹腔镜手术后环周切缘阳性率不低于机器人手术。
方法/设计:本研究将纳入使用可弯曲腹腔镜器械进行低位前切除术治疗的原发性直肠癌患者。参与的结直肠外科医生必须至少在TME过程中使用可弯曲腹腔镜器械。基于之前的研究,我们假设机器人手术后环周切缘阳性率为6%。假设有10%的失访率,一项有157例患者参与主要结局分析的试验将有80%的把握度以5.2%的非劣效界值宣布非劣效性。为比较腹腔镜TME组和机器人TME组,我们使用倾向得分匹配对性别、T分期、N分期、保肛状态和术前放化疗等变量进行调整。本研究的主要终点是术后环周切缘。
基于本研究,我们希望证明可弯曲腹腔镜器械在治疗直肠癌方面的疗效和可行性,且成本低于机器人手术。
韩国临床研究信息服务中心KCT0008896。于2023年8月15日注册。