Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.022. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
Dispositional optimism, a personality trait characterized by generalized positive expectations towards the future, is thought to remain rather stable over time. It is however largely unknown to what extent affective disorders and its risk factors affect dispositional optimism.
We examined the association between (lifetime) affective disorders and childhood trauma with dispositional optimism in a sample of 2104 subjects (aged 18-65 years) from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Dispositional optimism was measured with the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R). Diagnoses of depressive and anxiety disorders were based on the Composite Interview diagnostic Instrument (CIDI).Childhood trauma was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Interview (CTI) and life-events with the List of Threatening Events Questionnaire (LTQ).
The 2104 participants were on average 46.0 (SD 13.1) years old and 65.8% were female. Multivariate analyses showed that dispositional optimism was inversely associated with current affective disorders (depression: B=-1.089 and anxiety: B=-1.066, both p<0.001), but also with remitted affective disorders (depression: B=-0.822 and anxiety: B=-0.558, both p<0.001) and severity of depression (B=-4.230; p<0.001). A history of childhood emotional maltreatment (B=-0.905, p<0.001) was related to lower optimism, whilst positive life-events were associated with higher levels of optimism (B=0.235, p>0.001).
The cross-sectional design hampers inferences about causality.
Lower levels of dispositional optimism are associated with stage of affective disorders, even after remission, and a history of childhood emotional maltreatment. Identification of the risk factors contributes to understand fluctuations in dispositional optimism.
性格特质中的倾向性乐观主义,其特征是对未来的普遍积极期望,被认为在时间上相对稳定。然而,情绪障碍及其危险因素在多大程度上影响倾向性乐观主义还知之甚少。
我们在荷兰抑郁与焦虑研究(NESDA)的 2104 名受试者(年龄在 18-65 岁之间)中,研究了(终身)情绪障碍和儿童期创伤与倾向性乐观主义之间的关系。采用生活取向测试修订版(LOT-R)测量倾向性乐观主义。抑郁和焦虑障碍的诊断基于复合访谈诊断工具(CIDI)。儿童期创伤采用儿童期创伤访谈(CTI)评估,生活事件采用威胁事件问卷(LTQ)评估。
2104 名参与者的平均年龄为 46.0(标准差 13.1)岁,65.8%为女性。多变量分析显示,倾向性乐观主义与当前的情绪障碍呈负相关(抑郁:B=-1.089,焦虑:B=-1.066,均 p<0.001),与缓解的情绪障碍(抑郁:B=-0.822,焦虑:B=-0.558,均 p<0.001)和抑郁严重程度(B=-4.230;p<0.001)也呈负相关。儿童时期情感虐待的经历(B=-0.905,p<0.001)与较低的乐观主义相关,而积极的生活事件与较高的乐观主义水平相关(B=0.235,p>0.001)。
横断面设计限制了对因果关系的推断。
即使在缓解后,与情绪障碍的阶段以及儿童时期情感虐待的经历相关,倾向性乐观主义水平也较低。识别这些危险因素有助于理解倾向性乐观主义的波动。