Suppr超能文献

一线抗表皮生长因子受体治疗与抗血管内皮生长因子治疗在晚期结直肠癌中的作用比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析

Role of first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy compared with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Khattak Muhammad A, Martin Hilary, Davidson Andrew, Phillips Michael

机构信息

Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia; University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.

Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia; University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015 Jun;14(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have demonstrated efficacy in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Data from randomized studies comparing these monoclonal antibodies as initial therapy is conflicting, and their comparative efficacy remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of these targeted therapies on patient outcomes by combining the data from randomized clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and meeting proceedings within the past 12 months were searched to identify relevant studies. All randomized phase II/III clinical trials of advanced CRC comparing an anti-EGFR therapy with an anti-VEGF agent in the first-line setting were included. Data were extracted on sample size, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Three randomized studies comprising 2014 participants were included in the meta-analysis. For patients with KRAS wild type (KRAS-WT) CRC, the ORR was superior in patients who received first-line anti-EGFR therapy compared with those who received anti-VEGF therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.58; P = .004). This effect was even stronger for all RAS-WT patients (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.13-1.90; P = .004). There was no difference in PFS overall irrespective of the KRAS-WT (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P = .61) or all RAS-WT (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.71-1.18; P = .50) status. The OS was significantly longer in the patients who received first-line anti-EGFR therapy compared with those who received anti-VEGF therapy (KRAS-WT: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97; P = .026; all RAS-WT: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; P = .016).

CONCLUSION

The results of our research show superior ORR and OS with first-line anti-EGFR therapy compared with anti-VEGF therapy in both KRAS-WT and all RAS-WT patients with advanced CRC. These results suggest that anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies may be a real alternative to anti-VEGF therapy as initial treatment of advanced CRC.

摘要

背景

靶向表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)或血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的单克隆抗体已证实在晚期结直肠癌(CRC)一线治疗中与化疗联合使用具有疗效。比较这些单克隆抗体作为初始治疗的随机研究数据相互矛盾,其相对疗效仍不明确。我们旨在通过合并随机临床试验的数据来评估这些靶向治疗对患者预后的影响。

材料与方法

检索过去12个月内的MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE及会议论文集以确定相关研究。纳入所有在一线治疗中比较抗EGFR治疗与抗VEGF药物的晚期CRC随机II/III期临床试验。提取样本量、客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的数据。

结果

三项随机研究共2014名参与者纳入荟萃分析。对于KRAS野生型(KRAS-WT)CRC患者,接受一线抗EGFR治疗的患者ORR优于接受抗VEGF治疗的患者(优势比[OR],1.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.09 - 1.58;P = .004)。对于所有RAS野生型(RAS-WT)患者,这种效果更强(OR,1.46;95% CI,1.13 - 1.90;P = .004)。无论KRAS-WT(风险比[HR],1.03;95% CI,0.93 - 1.13;P = .61)或所有RAS-WT(HR,0.92;95% CI,0.71 - 1.18;P = .50)状态如何,PFS总体上无差异。接受一线抗EGFR治疗的患者OS明显长于接受抗VEGF治疗的患者(KRAS-WT:HR,0.79;95% CI,0.65 - 0.97;P = .026;所有RAS-WT:HR,0.77;95% CI,0.63 - 0.95;P = .016)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在KRAS-WT和所有RAS-WT的晚期CRC患者中,一线抗EGFR治疗与抗VEGF治疗相比,ORR和OS更优。这些结果表明,抗EGFR单克隆抗体可能是晚期CRC初始治疗中抗VEGF治疗的一个真正替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验