Hanson Stephen S
Department of Philosophy, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Jun;33(5):421-4. doi: 10.1177/1049909115570999. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
Since the Netherlands produced the Groningen protocol describing the methods to be used for pediatric euthanasia and Belgium passed laws authorizing euthanasia for children who consent to it, the issue of pediatric euthanasia has become a relevant topic to discuss. Most rejections of pediatric euthanasia fall into 1 or more of 3 categories, each of which has problems. This article shows how several recent arguments against pediatric euthanasia fail to prove that pediatric euthanasia is unacceptable. It does not follow from this that the practice is permissible but rather that if one is to reject such a practice, stronger arguments will need to be made, especially in countries where adult euthanasia or assisted suicide is already permitted.
自从荷兰出台了描述用于儿科安乐死的方法的《格罗宁根议定书》,以及比利时通过法律授权对同意安乐死的儿童实施安乐死以来,儿科安乐死问题已成为一个值得讨论的相关话题。大多数对儿科安乐死的反对意见可归为以下3类中的1类或更多类,每一类都存在问题。本文展示了最近一些反对儿科安乐死的论点是如何未能证明儿科安乐死是不可接受的。但这并不意味着这种做法是被允许的,而是说如果有人要反对这种做法,就需要提出更有力的论据,尤其是在已经允许成人安乐死或协助自杀的国家。