• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性腹痛障碍的非药物治疗:系统评价。

Nonpharmacologic treatment of functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma's Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and

Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma's Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):522-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2123. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2014-2123
PMID:25667239
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Various nonpharmacologic treatments are available for pediatric abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders (AP-FGIDs). Data on efficacy and safety are scarce. The goal of this study was to summarize the evidence regarding nonpharmacologic interventions for pediatric AP-FGIDs: lifestyle interventions, dietary interventions, behavioral interventions, prebiotics and probiotics, and alternative medicine.

METHODS

Searches were conducted of the Medline and Cochrane Library databases. Systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning nonpharmacologic therapies in children (aged 3-18 years) with AP-FGIDs were included, and data were extracted on participants, interventions, and outcomes. The quality of evidence was assessed by using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs were found that included 1390 children. Significant improvement of abdominal pain was reported after hypnotherapy compared with standard care/wait-list approaches and after cognitive behavioral therapy compared with a variety of control treatments/wait-list approaches. Written self-disclosure improved pain frequency at the 6-month follow-up only. Compared with placebo, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and VSL#3 were associated with significantly more treatment responders (LGG relative risk: 1.31 [95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.59]; VSL#3: P < .05). Guar gum significantly improved irritable bowel syndrome symptom frequency; however, no effect was found for other fiber supplements (relative risk: 1.17 [95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 1.81]) or a lactose-free diet. Functional disability was not significantly decreased after yoga compared with a wait-list approach. No studies were found concerning lifestyle interventions; gluten-, histamine-, or carbonic acid-free diets; fluid intake; or prebiotics. No serious adverse effects were reported. The quality of evidence was found to be very low to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Although high-quality studies are lacking, some evidence shows efficacy of hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and probiotics (LGG and VSL#3) in pediatric AP-FGIDs. Data on fiber supplements are inconclusive.

摘要

背景和目的

针对与小儿腹痛相关的功能性胃肠疾病(AP-FGIDs),有多种非药物治疗方法。目前关于这些治疗方法的疗效和安全性的数据有限。本研究旨在总结非药物干预治疗小儿 AP-FGIDs 的证据,包括生活方式干预、饮食干预、行为干预、益生菌和益生元以及替代医学。

方法

检索 Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。纳入了关于儿童(3-18 岁)AP-FGIDs 非药物治疗的系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT),并提取了参与者、干预措施和结局的数据。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据质量。

结果

共发现 24 项 RCT,纳入了 1390 名儿童。与标准护理/等待名单方法相比,催眠疗法可显著改善腹痛症状;与各种对照治疗/等待名单方法相比,认知行为疗法也可显著改善腹痛症状。仅在 6 个月随访时,书面自我披露可改善疼痛发作频率。与安慰剂相比,鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(LGG)和 VSL#3 与更多的治疗应答者相关(LGG:相对风险 1.31 [95%置信区间:1.08 至 1.59];VSL#3:P <.05)。瓜尔胶可显著改善肠易激综合征症状发作频率;然而,其他纤维补充剂(相对风险 1.17 [95%置信区间:0.75 至 1.81])或无乳糖饮食对其无效果。与等待名单方法相比,瑜伽并不能显著降低功能障碍。未发现关于生活方式干预、无谷胶、组胺或碳酸饮食、液体摄入或益生菌的研究。未报告严重不良事件。证据质量被认为是极低到中度。

结论

尽管缺乏高质量的研究,但一些证据表明催眠疗法、认知行为疗法和益生菌(LGG 和 VSL#3)对小儿 AP-FGIDs 有效。关于纤维补充剂的数据尚无定论。

相似文献

1
Nonpharmacologic treatment of functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review.功能性腹痛障碍的非药物治疗:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):522-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2123. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
2
Dietary interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood.儿童复发性腹痛的饮食干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;3(3):CD010972. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010972.pub2.
3
Probiotics for management of functional abdominal pain disorders in children.益生菌治疗儿童功能性腹痛疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 17;2(2):CD012849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012849.pub2.
4
Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood.儿童复发性腹痛的心理社会干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):CD010971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010971.pub2.
5
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性复发性疼痛的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 29;9(9):CD003968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub5.
6
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease.干预措施用于克罗恩病和炎症性肠病的腹痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):CD013531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013531.pub2.
7
Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.体力活动治疗肠易激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD011497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011497.pub2.
8
Gut microbiome-based interventions for the management of obesity in children and adolescents aged up to 19 years.基于肠道微生物群的干预措施用于管理19岁及以下儿童和青少年的肥胖问题。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 10;7(7):CD015875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015875.
9
Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.预防产后便秘的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 18;2015(9):CD011625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011625.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal Migraine in Adults: A Narrative Review.成人腹型偏头痛:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85958. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85958. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
"I'm a bit more free": Lived symptom experiences in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders after internet-delivered psychological treatment.“我感觉更自由了”:接受互联网心理治疗后功能性腹痛障碍青少年的症状体验
J Health Psychol. 2025 Aug;30(9):2282-2296. doi: 10.1177/13591053251320600. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
Children's and Their Parents' Experiences With Home-Based Guided Hypnotherapy: Qualitative Study.
儿童及其父母在家中接受引导式催眠疗法的体验:定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Jan 27;8:e58301. doi: 10.2196/58301.
4
Navigating through 65 years of insights: lessons learned on functional abdominal pain in children.穿越 65 载洞见:儿童功能性腹痛的经验教训。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Sep;183(9):3689-3703. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05667-4. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
A Low-FODMAP Diet in the Management of Children With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders: A Protocol of a Systematic Review.低聚果糖二糖饮食在功能性腹痛障碍儿童管理中的应用:一项系统评价方案
JPGN Rep. 2021 Mar 30;2(2):e065. doi: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000065. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Home-based guided hypnotherapy for children with functional abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基于家庭的引导性催眠治疗在初级保健中对功能性腹痛和肠易激综合征儿童的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e069653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069653.
7
The burden and impact of recurrent abdominal pain - exploring the understanding and perception of children and their parents.复发性腹痛的负担与影响——探究儿童及其父母的理解与认知
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Sep 21;10(1):888-912. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2121710. eCollection 2022.
8
Current treatment practice of functional abdominal pain disorders in children: A multicenter survey.儿童功能性腹痛障碍的现行治疗实践:一项多中心调查。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug;41(4):369-377. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01253-4. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
9
Hypnosis to Reduce Distress in Children Undergoing Anorectal Manometry: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.催眠减轻接受肛门直肠测压术儿童的痛苦:一项随机对照试验性研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Apr 30;28(2):312-319. doi: 10.5056/jnm20274.
10
Probiotics and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Pediatric Age: A Narrative Review.儿童期益生菌与功能性胃肠疾病:一项叙述性综述
Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 16;10:805466. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.805466. eCollection 2022.