• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of endoscopic polidocanol injection and YAG laser therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers.

作者信息

Rutgeerts P, Vantrappen G, Broeckaert L, Coremans G, Janssens J, Hiele M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Lancet. 1989 May 27;1(8648):1164-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92751-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92751-7
PMID:2566736
Abstract

392 patients were examined by endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; 140 had ulcers containing an actively bleeding visible vessel or a non-bleeding visible vessel and were enrolled in a randomised trial of three endoscopic methods of haemostasis--adrenaline (1/10(4] alone, adrenaline plus polidocanol 1%, and adrenaline followed by yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser photocoagulation. For patients with non-bleeding visible vessels sham treatment was significantly less effective in achieving haemostasis (8 of 20 patients) than were adrenaline plus polidocanol (18 of 20; p = 0.002) and adrenaline plus laser (16 of 20; p = 0.012). All three treatments significantly reduced total transfusion needs compared with sham treatment. For the whole group of patients, adrenaline plus polidocanol was significantly more effective than adrenaline alone in achieving permanent haemostasis; adrenaline plus laser was also more effective than adrenaline alone, but not significantly so. The efficacy of the three treatments was enhanced by repeated application on recurrence of bleeding. Since injection therapy with adrenaline and polidocanol was at least as effective as adrenaline plus laser therapy, it should be preferred over laser therapy because it is cheaper, easier to use, and perhaps also safer.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of endoscopic polidocanol injection and YAG laser therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers.
Lancet. 1989 May 27;1(8648):1164-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92751-7.
2
Endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers: randomised comparison of adrenaline injection and adrenaline injection + Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation.内镜治疗消化性溃疡出血:肾上腺素注射与肾上腺素注射+钕钇铝石榴石激光光凝术的随机对照比较
Gut. 1991 Oct;32(10):1100-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.10.1100.
3
Endoscopic injection therapy of bleeding ulcer: a prospective and randomized comparison of adrenaline alone or with polidocanol.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993 Oct;17(3):195-200. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199310000-00005.
4
Randomised trial of single and repeated fibrin glue compared with injection of polidocanol in treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer.
Lancet. 1997 Sep 6;350(9079):692-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)03233-9.
5
Endoscopic injection therapy to prevent rebleeding from peptic ulcers with a protruding vessel: a controlled comparative trial.内镜注射疗法预防伴有突出血管的消化性溃疡再出血:一项对照比较试验。
Gut. 1993 Mar;34(3):348-50. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.348.
6
Controlled trial of endoscopic sclerosis in bleeding peptic ulcers.
Lancet. 1987 Dec 5;2(8571):1292-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91191-3.
7
A prospective randomized trial of heater probe thermocoagulation versus injection therapy in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.一项关于热探头热凝术与注射疗法治疗消化性溃疡出血的前瞻性随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Feb;43(2 Pt 1):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(06)80111-2.
8
Orally administered omeprazole versus injection therapy in the prevention of rebleeding from peptic ulcer with visible vessel. A multicenter randomized study.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1993;17(5):329-33.
9
Endoscopic hemostasis by local injection of epinephrine and polidocanol in bleeding ulcer. A prospective randomized trial.
Endoscopy. 1988 Nov;20(6):289-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013023.
10
Local therapeutic injection in bleeding peptic ulcer: a comparison of adrenaline to adrenaline plus a sclerosing agent.出血性消化性溃疡的局部治疗性注射:肾上腺素与肾上腺素加硬化剂的比较
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2002 Jul;94(7):395-405.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized sham-controlled trials in endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events.内镜随机假对照试验:不良事件的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):972-985.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: dual therapy for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers.系统评价与网状Meta分析:高危出血性消化性溃疡的双联疗法
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0610-0.
3
Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation.
两种联合疗法治疗消化性溃疡出血的疗效比较:肾上腺素注射加止血夹与肾上腺素注射后双极电凝术
Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9(6):354-60. doi: 10.5114/pg.2014.47898. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
4
How evidence-based are current guidelines for managing patients with peptic ulcer bleeding?目前管理消化性溃疡出血患者的指南有多少循证医学证据?
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jan 27;2(1):9-13. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i1.9.
5
Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血
Ulster Med J. 2006 Jan;75(1):32-9.
6
[Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Diagnosis and management].[急性上消化道出血。诊断与管理]
Internist (Berl). 2003 May;44(5):519-28, 530-2. doi: 10.1007/s00108-003-0918-4.
7
Variable use of endoscopic haemostasis in the management of bleeding peptic ulcers.内镜下止血在消化性溃疡出血管理中的应用差异
Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jun;78(920):347-51. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.920.347.
8
Comparison of adrenaline injection and bipolar electrocoagulation for the arrest of peptic ulcer bleeding.肾上腺素注射与双极电凝治疗消化性溃疡出血的比较。
Gut. 1999 May;44(5):715-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.5.715.
9
A randomised controlled comparison of injection, thermal, and mechanical endoscopic methods of haemostasis on mesenteric vessels.注射、热凝及机械性内镜下肠系膜血管止血方法的随机对照比较
Gut. 1998 Apr;42(4):462-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.4.462.
10
A practical guide to the management of bleeding ulcers.出血性溃疡管理实用指南
Drugs. 1997 Mar;53(3):389-403. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753030-00004.