Baim-Lance Abigail, Tietz Daniel, Schlefer Madeleine, Agins Bruce
University College London, London, United Kingdom
New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(2):252-63. doi: 10.1177/1049732315569736. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Most of the research on health care user "quality of care" perspectives seeks discrete and measurable indicators to advance quality improvement (QI) goals. This lacks sufficiently grounded query about the meaning of "quality of care" for health users, and how context influences their ideas and experiences. We studied this between 2010 and 2011, repeatedly interviewing and shadowing 45 individuals in three of New York's hospital-based outpatient HIV care settings during routine visits. We found participants using common terminology, but across the cohort meaning varied and employed personal narratives. Participants conveyed the impact of historic and current experiences of stigma and discrimination on limiting access to care, and showed its destabilizing effects on quality constructs. Participants also felt they contributed to their health care settings' delivery of quality care. From our findings, we discuss the applicability and implications of "co-production" to conceptualize health care as jointly delivered by typical "givers" and "receivers" of care.
大多数关于医疗保健使用者“护理质量”观点的研究都在寻找离散且可衡量的指标,以推进质量改进(QI)目标。这缺乏对医疗保健使用者而言“护理质量”的含义以及背景如何影响他们的观念和体验进行充分有依据的探究。我们在2010年至2011年期间对此进行了研究,在纽约市三家医院门诊艾滋病毒护理机构的常规就诊期间,对45个人进行了多次访谈并进行跟踪观察。我们发现参与者使用的是常见术语,但在整个队列中含义各不相同,且采用了个人叙述。参与者传达了过去和当前的耻辱感和歧视经历对限制获得护理的影响,并展示了其对质量概念的破坏稳定作用。参与者还觉得他们为所在医疗保健机构提供高质量护理做出了贡献。基于我们的研究结果,我们讨论了“共同生产”在将医疗保健概念化为由典型的护理“提供者”和“接受者”共同提供方面的适用性和影响。