• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《儿童抑郁量表在韩国青少年筛查和评估严重程度中的截断分数》。

Cut-Off Scores of the Children's Depression Inventory for Screening and Rating Severity in Korean Adolescents.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jan;12(1):23-8. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.1.23. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

DOI:10.4306/pi.2015.12.1.23
PMID:25670942
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4310917/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to establish an optimal cut-off score of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) for detecting depression and rating severity in Korean adolescents.

METHODS

A total of 468 students aged 12-16 years from 8 middle schools in Busan, Korea participated in this study. The Korean version of the CDI and Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version were used to evaluate depressive symptoms. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were conducted to evaluate case-finding performance and set the cut-off scores.

RESULTS

ROC analyses demonstrated that the overall discrimination power of the CDI is good enough to evaluate adolescent depression. The CDI sum score of 20 was identified as the optimal screening cut-off score, where sensitivity was 0.83 and specificity was 0.89. This cut-off score could apply regardless of subjects' gender. The cut-off scores were examined in order of the depression severity: 15 for mild, 20 for moderate, and 25 for severe depression with high sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

The CDI cut-off scores of our study can be recommended for screening depressed youth and rating the severity of depressive symptoms. The high negative predictive value suggested that the cut-off score of 20 would result in a small number of missed cases. Further studies are needed to ascertain these CDI cut-off scores for different age groups.

摘要

目的

旨在为韩国青少年建立儿童抑郁量表(CDI)的最佳截断分数,以用于检测抑郁和评估严重程度。

方法

本研究共纳入来自韩国釜山 8 所中学的 468 名 12-16 岁的学生。采用儿童抑郁量表(Korean version of the CDI)和儿童心境障碍和精神分裂症现患及 Lifetime 版本 Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS-PL) 评估抑郁症状。采用受试者工作特征(receiver-operating characteristics,ROC)分析评估病例发现性能并确定截断分数。

结果

ROC 分析表明,CDI 的整体判别能力足以评估青少年抑郁。CDI 总分 20 被确定为最佳筛查截断分数,此时敏感性为 0.83,特异性为 0.89。该截断分数可适用于不同性别的受试者。根据抑郁严重程度依次检查截断分数:轻度抑郁为 15,中度抑郁为 20,重度抑郁为 25,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。

结论

本研究的 CDI 截断分数可用于筛查抑郁青少年和评估抑郁症状严重程度。高阴性预测值表明,截断分数为 20 时可能会漏诊少数病例。需要进一步研究以确定不同年龄组的 CDI 截断分数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd2/4310917/084147816436/pi-12-23-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd2/4310917/084147816436/pi-12-23-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd2/4310917/084147816436/pi-12-23-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cut-Off Scores of the Children's Depression Inventory for Screening and Rating Severity in Korean Adolescents.《儿童抑郁量表在韩国青少年筛查和评估严重程度中的截断分数》。
Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jan;12(1):23-8. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.1.23. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
2
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
The Beck depression inventory-II in adolescent mental health patients: cut-off scores for detecting depression and rating severity.贝克抑郁自评量表 II 在青少年心理健康患者中的应用:用于检测抑郁和评估严重程度的截断分数。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 May 30.
4
Reliability and validity of the Children's Depression Inventory-Japanese version.儿童抑郁量表日本版的信度和效度
Pediatr Int. 2019 Nov;61(11):1159-1167. doi: 10.1111/ped.13984.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Inventory 2 Short Version as a Screening Tool: A Comparison With the Standard 28-Item Version.儿童抑郁量表2简版韩文版作为筛查工具的信效度:与标准28项版本的比较
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Jan;19(1):54-60. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0296. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
6
Screening for anxiety and depression in dialysis patients: comparison of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory.透析患者焦虑和抑郁的筛查:医院焦虑和抑郁量表与贝克抑郁量表的比较。
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Aug;73(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
7
Prevalence of depression and validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Children's Depression Inventory-Short amongst HIV-positive adolescents in Malawi.马拉维艾滋病毒阳性青少年中抑郁症的患病率以及贝克抑郁量表第二版和儿童抑郁量表简版的效度验证
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Jul 30;17(1):18965. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18965. eCollection 2014.
8
High-end specificity of the children's depression inventory in a sample of anxiety-disordered youth.儿童抑郁量表在焦虑症青少年样本中的高端特异性。
Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20059.
9
The Children's Depression Inventory as a screen for depression in Thai children.儿童抑郁量表作为泰国儿童抑郁症的筛查工具。
J Med Assoc Thai. 1997 Aug;80(8):491-9.
10
Sensitivity and specificity of the Beck Depression Inventory in cardiologic inpatients: how useful is the conventional cut-off score?贝克抑郁量表在心脏病住院患者中的敏感性和特异性:传统的临界值分数有多大用处?
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Oct;67(4):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Amygdala-hippocampus connectivity and childhood depressive symptoms: subnuclei insights and self-concept roles.杏仁核-海马体连接与儿童抑郁症状:亚核层面见解及自我概念的作用
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):293. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03524-y.
2
The burden of eating disorder risk in Chinese adolescents: prevalence, multilevel correlates, and psychosocial differences in a national study.中国青少年饮食失调风险负担:一项全国性研究中的患病率、多层次关联因素及社会心理差异
BMC Med. 2025 Aug 15;23(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04319-0.
3
Risk factors for depression symptoms in adolescents: A population-based study.

本文引用的文献

1
Cut-off scores of a brief neuropsychological battery (NBACE) for Spanish individual adults older than 44 years old.用于 44 岁以上西班牙个体成年人的简短神经心理测验组合(NBACE)的截断分数。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076436. eCollection 2013.
2
National comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement (NCS-A): II. Overview and design.全国共病调查复制青少年补充调查(NCS - A):II. 概述与设计。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;48(4):380-385. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181999705.
3
The validity of the CGI severity and improvement scales as measures of clinical effectiveness suitable for routine clinical use.
青少年抑郁症状的风险因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Saudi Med J. 2025 Feb;46(2):190-198. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.2.20240914.
4
Attenuated Doors-Locked P300 Amplitude and Elevated Depressive Symptoms: Effects of Age and Sex in Two Independent Samples of Youth.门控P300波幅衰减与抑郁症状加重:年龄和性别在两个独立青年样本中的影响
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70009. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70009.
5
Effects of Ketamine vs. Midazolam in Adolescent Treatment Resistant Depression.氯胺酮与咪达唑仑对青少年难治性抑郁症的疗效比较
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Dec 4;17(12):1627. doi: 10.3390/ph17121627.
6
Evaluating depression in Indonesian adolescents with epilepsy: Comprehensive validation and reliability assessment of the neurological disorders depression inventory-epilepsy for youth Indonesian version (NDDI-E-Y[ID]).评估印度尼西亚癫痫青少年的抑郁症:青少年版印度尼西亚语神经疾病抑郁量表 - 癫痫(NDDI-E-Y[ID])的全面效度和信度评估。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Dec;9(6):2342-2352. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13052. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
7
Unlocking the potential of the 3-hydroxykynurenine/kynurenic acid ratio: a promising biomarker in adolescent major depressive disorder.揭示3-羟基犬尿氨酸/犬尿喹啉酸比值的潜力:青少年重度抑郁症中有前景的生物标志物
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01815-x.
8
Self-concept mediates the relationships between childhood traumatic experiences and adolescent depression in both clinical and community samples.自我概念在临床和社区样本中均介导了儿童期创伤经历与青少年抑郁之间的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05671-w.
9
Adherence to medical treatment for Wilson's disease in children and adolescents: a cohort study from Turkey.儿童和青少年威尔逊病的药物治疗依从性:来自土耳其的队列研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Mar 7;19(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03113-0.
10
Revealing complexity: segmentation of hippocampal subfields in adolescents with major depressive disorder reveals specific links to cognitive dysfunctions.揭示复杂性:对患有重度抑郁症的青少年海马亚区进行分割,揭示了与认知功能障碍的特定联系。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 23;68(1):e5. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.15.
作为适用于常规临床应用的临床疗效衡量指标,临床总体印象量表(CGI)严重程度和改善量表的有效性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;14(6):979-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00921.x. Epub 2008 May 2.
4
The Children's Depression Inventory and classification of major depressive disorder: validity and reliability of the Danish version.儿童抑郁量表与重度抑郁症的分类:丹麦语版本的效度与信度
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;14(6):328-34. doi: 10.1007/s00787-005-0479-2.
5
Index for rating diagnostic tests.诊断试验评级指数。
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.
6
Assessing depression in youth: relation between the Children's Depression Inventory and a structured interview.评估青少年抑郁症:儿童抑郁量表与结构化访谈之间的关系
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2004 Mar;33(1):149-57. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3301_14.
7
The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K).儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前及终生版-韩语版(K-SADS-PL-K)的信度和效度。
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Feb 29;45(1):81-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.81.
8
Course and outcome of child and adolescent major depressive disorder.儿童及青少年重度抑郁症的病程及转归
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;11(3):619-37, x. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00011-1.
9
Emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence: national panel results from three countries.青春期抑郁症中性别差异的出现:来自三个国家的全国性面板研究结果
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;41(2):190-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200202000-00013.
10
Joint factor analysis of the Children's Depression Inventory and the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale.儿童抑郁量表与修订版儿童显性焦虑量表的联合因素分析
J Clin Child Psychol. 2001 Dec;30(4):552-67. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3004_11.