• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以重症监护病房镇静药物消耗量作为监测工具评估一种最小化镇静方案:一项质量改进多中心项目

Evaluation of a minimal sedation protocol using ICU sedative consumption as a monitoring tool: a quality improvement multicenter project.

作者信息

Ranzani Otavio T, Simpson Evelyn Senna, Augusto Talita Barbosa, Cappi Sylas Bezerra, Noritomi Danilo Teixeira

出版信息

Crit Care. 2014 Oct 24;18(5):580. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0580-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-014-0580-3
PMID:25673553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4234844/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oversedation frequently occurs in ICUs. We aimed to evaluate a minimal sedation policy, using sedative consumption as a monitoring tool, in a network of ICUs targeting decrement of oversedation and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration.

METHODS

A prospective quality improvement project was conducted in ten ICUs within a network of nonteaching hospitals in Brazil during a 2-year period (2010 to 2012). In the first 12 months (the preintervention period), we conducted an audit to identify sedation practice and barriers to current guideline-based practice regarding sedation. In the postintervention period, we implemented a multifaceted program, including multidisciplinary daily rounds, and monthly audits focusing on sedative consumption, feedback and benchmarking purposes. To analyze the effect of the campaign, we fit an interrupted time series (ITS). To account for variability among the network ICUs, we fit a hierarchical model.

RESULTS

During the study period, 21% of patients received MV (4,851/22,963). In the postintervention period, the length of MV was lower (3.91 ± 6.2 days versus 3.15 ± 4.6 days; mean difference, -0.76 (95% CI, -1.10; -0.43), P <0.001) and 28 ventilator-free days were higher (16.07 ± 12.2 days versus 18.33 ± 11.6 days; mean difference, 2.30 (95% CI, 1.57; 3.00), P <0.001) than in the preintervention period. Midazolam consumption (in milligrams per day of MV) decreased from 329 ± 70 mg/day to 163 ± 115 mg/day (mean difference, -167 (95% CI, -246; -87), P <0.001). In contrast, consumption of propofol (P = 0.007), dexmedetomidine (P = 0.017) and haloperidol (P = 0.002) increased in the postintervention period, without changes in the consumption of fentanyl. Through ITS, age (P = 0.574) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (P = 0.176) remained stable. The length of MV showed a secular effect (secular trend β(1) = -0.055, P = 0.012) and a strong decrease immediately after the intervention (intervention β(2) = -0.976, P <0.001). The impact was maintained over the course of one year, despite the waning trend for the intervention's effect (postintervention trend β(3)= 0.039, P = 0.095).

CONCLUSIONS

By using a light sedation policy in a group of nonteaching hospitals, we reproduced the benefits that have previously been demonstrated in controlled settings. Furthermore, systematic monitoring of sedative consumption should be a feasible instrument for supporting the implementation of a protocol on a large scale.

摘要

引言

在重症监护病房(ICU)中,过度镇静经常发生。我们旨在评估一种以镇静药物消耗量作为监测工具的最小化镇静策略,该策略应用于一个旨在减少过度镇静和机械通气(MV)时长的ICU网络中。

方法

在巴西非教学医院网络中的10个ICU开展了一项为期2年(2010年至2012年)的前瞻性质量改进项目。在最初的12个月(干预前期),我们进行了一次审核,以确定镇静实践以及当前基于指南的镇静实践所面临的障碍。在干预后期,我们实施了一个多方面的项目,包括多学科每日查房,以及以镇静药物消耗量、反馈和基准化为重点的月度审核。为分析该活动的效果,我们采用了中断时间序列(ITS)。为考虑网络内各ICU之间的差异,我们采用了分层模型。

结果

在研究期间,21%的患者接受了MV(4851/22963)。在干预后期,MV时长缩短(分别为3.91±6.2天和3.15±4.6天;平均差值为-0.76(95%CI,-1.10;-0.43),P<0.001),无呼吸机天数增加(分别为16.07±12.2天和18.33±11.6天;平均差值为2.30(95%CI,1.57;3.00),P<0.001)。咪达唑仑消耗量(以MV每日毫克数计)从329±70毫克/天降至163±115毫克/天(平均差值为-167(95%CI,-246;-87),P<0.001)。相比之下,在干预后期丙泊酚(P=0.007)、右美托咪定(P=0.017)和氟哌啶醇(P=0.002)的消耗量增加,而芬太尼的消耗量无变化。通过ITS分析,年龄(P=0.574)和简化急性生理学评分III(P=0.176)保持稳定。MV时长呈现长期效应(长期趋势β(1)=-0.055,P=0.012),且在干预后立即大幅下降(干预β(2)=-0.976,P<0.001)。尽管干预效果呈减弱趋势(干预后趋势β(3)=0.039,P=0.095),但这种影响在一年中持续存在。

结论

通过在一组非教学医院中采用轻度镇静策略,我们再现了先前在对照环境中所证明的益处。此外,系统监测镇静药物消耗量应是支持大规模实施方案的可行手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/e0e15b1d13a2/13054_2014_580_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/93aa72fbd6e5/13054_2014_580_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/a161609c50f3/13054_2014_580_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/8c81d53a3d8d/13054_2014_580_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/e0e15b1d13a2/13054_2014_580_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/93aa72fbd6e5/13054_2014_580_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/a161609c50f3/13054_2014_580_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/8c81d53a3d8d/13054_2014_580_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31d/4234844/e0e15b1d13a2/13054_2014_580_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a minimal sedation protocol using ICU sedative consumption as a monitoring tool: a quality improvement multicenter project.以重症监护病房镇静药物消耗量作为监测工具评估一种最小化镇静方案:一项质量改进多中心项目
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 24;18(5):580. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0580-3.
2
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
3
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑或丙泊酚用于机械通气时间延长患者的镇静:两项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.
4
A Pediatric Sedation Protocol for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Requires Sustenance Beyond Implementation.机械通气患儿的镇静方案需要在实施之外给予维持。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;17(8):721-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000846.
5
Changing sedation practices in the intensive care unit--protocol implementation, multifaceted multidisciplinary approach and teamwork.重症监护病房中镇静措施的改变——方案实施、多方面多学科方法及团队协作。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;19(2):429-47.
6
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation.重症监护中右美托咪定与丙泊酚或咪达唑仑标准护理镇静的经济学评价
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 19;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0787-y.
7
Comparison of the effect of protocol-directed sedation with propofol vs. midazolam by nurses in intensive care: efficacy, haemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction.重症监护病房护士使用丙泊酚与咪达唑仑进行方案导向镇静的效果比较:疗效、血流动力学稳定性及患者满意度
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1510-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02128.x.
8
Optimal intravenous dosing strategies for sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中镇静剂和镇痛药的最佳静脉给药策略。
Crit Care Clin. 1995 Oct;11(4):827-47.
9
The impact of a quality improvement project to standardize pain, agitation, and withdrawal assessments on the use of morphine and midazolam in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.一项质量改进项目对儿科重症监护病房中疼痛、躁动和戒断评估进行标准化处理,对吗啡和咪达唑仑使用情况的影响。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Apr;29(4):322-330. doi: 10.1111/pan.13591. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于重症患者镇静的随机试验
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on the Epimed Monitor Adult ICU Database: 15 years of its use in national registries, quality improvement initiatives and clinical research.《关于 Epimed 成人 ICU 监测数据库的最新进展:15 年来在国家注册登记、质量改进计划和临床研究中的应用》
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Sep 2;36:e20240150en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240150-en. eCollection 2024.
2
Statistical analysis of a cluster-randomized clinical trial on adult general intensive care units in Brazil: TELE-critical care verSus usual Care On ICU PErformance (TELESCOPE) trial.巴西成人综合重症监护病房的一项集群随机临床试验的统计分析:TELE-重症监护与常规 ICU 护理对 ICU 绩效的影响(TELESCOPE)试验。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):87-95. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20220003-pt.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Early sedation and clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study.机械通气患者的早期镇静与临床结局:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究
Crit Care. 2014 Jul 21;18(4):R156. doi: 10.1186/cc13995.
2
Daily sedative interruption versus intermittent sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized trial.每日镇静剂间断给药与机械通气危重症患者间断镇静的随机试验
Ann Intensive Care. 2014 May 6;4:14. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-4-14. eCollection 2014.
3
Implementing a multifaceted tailored intervention to improve nutrition adequacy in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study.
TELE-critical Care verSus usual Care On ICU PErformance (TELESCOPE): protocol for a cluster-randomised clinical trial on adult general ICUs in Brazil.远程重症监护与常规 ICU 护理的比较(TELESCOPE):一项针对巴西成人综合 ICU 的集群随机临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 21;11(6):e042302. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042302.
4
Nursing workload associated with the frequency of multidisciplinary rounds: a cross-sectional study.护理工作量与多学科查房频率的关系:一项横断面研究。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):82-87. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210008.
5
Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review.运用中断时间序列法评估卫生系统质量改进干预措施:方法学系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003567.
6
The Epimed Monitor ICU Database®: a cloud-based national registry for adult intensive care unit patients in Brazil.淫羊藿监测重症监护病房数据库®:巴西成人重症监护病房患者的基于云的国家登记系统。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):418-426. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170062. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Loxapine to control agitation during weaning from mechanical ventilation.氯氮平控制机械通气撤机时的激越。
Crit Care. 2017 Sep 6;21(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1822-y.
8
Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.外周置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相比,与儿科重症监护患者的血流感染风险较低:一项倾向调整分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
9
Sedation protocols versus daily sedation interruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.镇静方案与每日镇静中断:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):444-451. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160078.
10
Chlorhexidine bathing for the prevention of colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant microorganisms in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation unit over a 9-year period: Impact on chlorhexidine susceptibility.在造血干细胞移植病房进行为期9年的洗必泰沐浴预防多重耐药微生物定植和感染:对洗必泰敏感性的影响
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(46):e5271. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005271.
实施多方面的针对性干预措施以改善危重症患者的营养充足状况:一项多中心可行性研究的结果
Crit Care. 2014 May 11;18(3):R96. doi: 10.1186/cc13867.
4
Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation.改进的镇痛、镇静和谵妄方案与谵妄持续时间和机械通气时间的缩短相关。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Mar;11(3):367-74. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-210OC.
5
What stops us from following sedation recommendations in intensive care units? A multicentric qualitative study.在重症监护病房,是什么阻碍了我们遵循镇静建议?一项多中心定性研究。
J Crit Care. 2014 Apr;29(2):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
6
Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness.危重病后的长期认知障碍。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 9;370(2):185-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1313886.
7
The implementation of an analgesia-based sedation protocol reduced deep sedation and proved to be safe and feasible in patients on mechanical ventilation.基于镇痛的镇静方案的实施减少了深度镇静,并被证明在机械通气患者中是安全可行的。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Jul-Sep;25(3):188-96. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130034.
8
Implementation of a multifaceted sepsis education program in an emerging country setting: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a long-term follow-up study.在新兴国家环境中实施多方面的脓毒症教育计划:长期随访研究中的临床结果和成本效益。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Feb;40(2):182-191. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3131-5. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
9
Benzodiazepine versus nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.苯二氮䓬类与非苯二氮䓬类药物在机械通气危重症成人患者中的镇静作用比较:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S30-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16898.
10
Early goal-directed sedation versus standard sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pilot study*.早期目标导向镇静与机械通气危重症患者常规镇静的比较:一项初步研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1983-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a437d.