Baldock Katherine C R, Goddard Mark A, Hicks Damien M, Kunin William E, Mitschunas Nadine, Osgathorpe Lynne M, Potts Simon G, Robertson Kirsty M, Scott Anna V, Stone Graham N, Vaughan Ian P, Memmott Jane
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UJ, UK
School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 22;282(1803):20142849. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849.
Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km(2)) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.
昆虫传粉者提供了一项至关重要的生态系统服务,但正受到威胁。城市地区对传粉者可能很重要,不过其相对于其他栖息地的价值却鲜为人知。我们在三种景观类型(城市、农田和自然保护区)的36个地点(每个地点1平方千米)使用量化的花卉访花网络对传粉者群落进行了比较。总体而言,三种景观类型之间的花卉访客丰度和物种丰富度没有显著差异。不同景观之间蜜蜂的丰度没有差异,但城市地区的蜜蜂物种丰富度高于农田。农田和自然保护区的食蚜蝇丰度高于城市地区,但物种丰富度没有显著差异。虽然城市传粉者组合在空间上比农田或自然保护区的组合更具同质性,但三种景观中稀有物种的数量没有显著差异。农田的网络层面专业化程度高于城市地区。相对于其他栖息地,城市访客取食的植物物种数量更多(普遍性更高),但访问的可用植物物种比例更低(专业化程度更高),这两者可能都是由城市植物丰富度更高所驱动的。城市地区正在不断扩张,提高其对传粉者的价值应成为任何保护和恢复传粉者的国家战略的一部分。