Confidence intervals and tests are two sides of the same research question.
作者信息
Perezgonzalez Jose D
机构信息
Business School, Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 28;6:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Confidence intervals and tests are two sides of the same research question.置信区间和检验是同一研究问题的两个方面。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 28;6:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.
2
Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.费歇尔、奈曼-皮尔逊还是 NHST？数据测试教学的教程。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 3;6:223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223. eCollection 2015.
3
Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.1975 - 2014年主要医学和流行病学杂志摘要中的统计推断：一项系统综述。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0211-1. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial.零假设显著性检验：简短教程。
F1000Res. 2015 Aug 25;4:621. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6963.3. eCollection 2015.
5
6
7
Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy: Or How the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Controversy Resulted in the Inferential Tail Wagging the Measurement Dog.显著性检验需要一种分类法：或者说费希尔与奈曼 - 皮尔逊之争如何导致推断结果本末倒置。
Psychol Rep. 2016 Oct;119(2):487-504. doi: 10.1177/0033294116662659. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
In support of null hypothesis significance testing.支持零假设显著性检验。
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 7;271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0105.
9
The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements.研究者与顾问：从检验到概率陈述。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;30(9):1003-8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0054-1. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
Neyman-Pearson confidence intervals for extreme low-level, paired counting.
Health Phys. 1999 Feb;76(2):186-90. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199902000-00011.
引用本文的文献
1
Effects of perceived change of urban destination on destination attachment.城市目的地感知变化对目的地依恋的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 22;13:1022421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022421. eCollection 2022.
2
Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.神经科学需要同时检验统计假设和科学假设。
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 9;42(45):8432-8438. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1134-22.2022.
3
Bayesian prediction intervals for assessing P-value variability in prospective replication studies.贝叶斯预测区间在评估前瞻性重复研究中 P 值变异性的应用。
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 8;7(12):1271. doi: 10.1038/s41398-017-0024-3.
4
The Heuristic Value of in Inductive Statistical Inference.归纳统计推断中[具体内容缺失]的启发式价值。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 9;8:908. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00908. eCollection 2017.
5
The meaning of significance in data testing.数据测试中显著性的含义。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 27;6:1293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01293. eCollection 2015.
6
Commentary: Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability.评论：持续累积的荟萃分析与可重复性。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 6;6:565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00565. eCollection 2015.
7
Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.费歇尔、奈曼-皮尔逊还是 NHST？数据测试教学的教程。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 3;6:223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223. eCollection 2015.
本文引用的文献
1
Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability.持续累积荟萃分析与可重复性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 May;9(3):333-42. doi: 10.1177/1745691614529796.
2
Measurement bias detection through Bayesian factor analysis.通过贝叶斯因子分析检测测量偏差。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 29;5:1087. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01087. eCollection 2014.
3
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals.对置信区间的严重误解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1157-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3.
4
The new statistics: why and how.新的统计数据：原因和方法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
What's in a Name: A Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of the Name-Letter Effect.名字里的学问：名字效应的贝叶斯层级分析
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 25;3:334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00334. eCollection 2012.
Zotero 插件