• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

名字里的学问:名字效应的贝叶斯层级分析

What's in a Name: A Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of the Name-Letter Effect.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 25;3:334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00334. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00334
PMID:23055989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3457077/
Abstract

People generally prefer their initials to the other letters of the alphabet, a phenomenon known as the name-letter effect. This effect, researchers have argued, makes people move to certain cities, buy particular brands of consumer products, and choose particular professions (e.g., Angela moves to Los Angeles, Phil buys a Philips TV, and Dennis becomes a dentist). In order to establish such associations between people's initials and their behavior, researchers typically carry out statistical analyses of large databases. Current methods of analysis ignore the hierarchical structure of the data, do not naturally handle order-restrictions, and are fundamentally incapable of confirming the null hypothesis. Here we outline a Bayesian hierarchical analysis that avoids these limitations and allows coherent inference both on the level of the individual and on the level of the group. To illustrate our method, we re-analyze two data sets that address the question of whether people are disproportionately likely to live in cities that resemble their name.

摘要

人们通常更喜欢他们名字的首字母而不是其他字母,这种现象被称为名字首字母效应。研究人员认为,这种效应使人们搬到某些城市,购买特定品牌的消费品,并选择特定的职业(例如,安吉拉搬到洛杉矶,菲尔购买飞利浦电视,丹尼斯成为牙医)。为了在人们的首字母和他们的行为之间建立这种联系,研究人员通常会对大型数据库进行统计分析。当前的分析方法忽略了数据的层次结构,不能自然处理顺序限制,并且从根本上无法确认零假设。在这里,我们概述了一种贝叶斯层次分析方法,该方法可以避免这些限制,并允许在个体和群体两个层面上进行连贯的推断。为了说明我们的方法,我们重新分析了两个数据集,这些数据集探讨了人们是否更有可能居住在与其名字相似的城市的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/662ade445d67/fpsyg-03-00334-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/318a8210c1e6/fpsyg-03-00334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/0589720876bd/fpsyg-03-00334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/61eabc0219a8/fpsyg-03-00334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/07284473c4f4/fpsyg-03-00334-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/662ade445d67/fpsyg-03-00334-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/318a8210c1e6/fpsyg-03-00334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/0589720876bd/fpsyg-03-00334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/61eabc0219a8/fpsyg-03-00334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/07284473c4f4/fpsyg-03-00334-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5c/3457077/662ade445d67/fpsyg-03-00334-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
What's in a Name: A Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of the Name-Letter Effect.名字里的学问:名字效应的贝叶斯层级分析
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 25;3:334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00334. eCollection 2012.
2
Name-letter branding under scrutiny: real products, new algorithms, and the probability of buying.名称字母品牌备受关注:真实产品、新算法和购买概率。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Jun;110(3 Pt 2):1089-97. doi: 10.2466/pms.110.C.1089-1097.
3
Testing the generality of the name letter effect: name initials and everyday attitudes.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Aug;31(8):1099-111. doi: 10.1177/0146167205274895.
4
The name-letter-effect in groups: sharing initials with group members increases the quality of group work.群体中的名-字效应:与小组成员拥有相同首字母会提高小组工作的质量。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e79039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079039. eCollection 2013.
5
Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: implicit egotism and major life decisions.为什么苏西在海边卖贝壳:内隐自我主义与重大人生决策。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):469-87.
6
Initial and noninitial name-letter preferences as obtained through repeated letter rating tasks continue to reflect (different aspects of) self-esteem.通过重复字母评级任务获得的首字母和非首字母偏好继续反映(自尊的不同方面)自尊。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):905-14. doi: 10.1037/pas0000092. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
What's in a name: Children's knowledge about the letters in their own names.名字里有什么:儿童对自己名字中字母的认识。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Aug;70(2):97-116. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2448.
8
Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.第1部分. 多种空气污染成分影响的统计学习方法
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):5-50.
9
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
10
What's in a name: mortality and the power of symbols.名字里有什么:死亡率与符号的力量。
J Psychosom Res. 1999 Sep;47(3):241-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00035-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence intervals and tests are two sides of the same research question.置信区间和检验是同一研究问题的两个方面。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 28;6:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.
2
A Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model decomposition of performance in Approach-Avoidance Tasks.在趋避任务中对表现进行的贝叶斯分层扩散模型分解。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(8):1424-44. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.985635. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests.实验心理学中的统计证据:使用 855 个 t 检验的实证比较。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406923.
2
Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data?心理学家是否必须改变他们分析数据的方式?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):716-9. doi: 10.1037/a0024777.
3
Spurious also? Name-similarity effects (implicit egotism) in employment decisions.也是虚假的吗?就业决策中的名字相似性效应(内隐自我主义)。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1087-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413937. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
4
The surprising potency of implicit egotism: A reply to Simonsohn.内隐自我中心主义的惊人效力:对西蒙松的回应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jul;101(1):25-30; discussion 31-3. doi: 10.1037/a0023526.
5
A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical bayesian methods.模型评估方法综述及分层贝叶斯方法教程
Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;32(8):1248-84. doi: 10.1080/03640210802414826.
6
Sexy but often unreliable: the impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings with implicit measures.性感但往往不可靠:不可靠性对内隐测量实验结果可重复性的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Apr;37(4):570-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167211400619.
7
Spurious? Name similarity effects (implicit egotism) in marriage, job, and moving decisions.虚假关联?婚姻、工作和搬家决策中的名字相似性效应(内隐自恋情结)。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jul;101(1):1-24. doi: 10.1037/a0021990.
8
Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).为什么心理学家必须改变分析数据的方式:psi 案例:评 Bem(2011)。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):426-32. doi: 10.1037/a0022790.
9
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis.相信什么:数据分析的贝叶斯方法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
10
Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method.贝叶斯假设检验对心理学家来说:萨维奇-迪基方法教程。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 May;60(3):158-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 12.