• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于基于证据的干预措施以改善腺瘤检测的多中心实用性研究:结肠镜检查质量改进(QIC)研究。

A multicenter pragmatic study of an evidence-based intervention to improve adenoma detection: the Quality Improvement in Colonoscopy (QIC) study.

作者信息

Rajasekhar Praveen T, Rees Colin J, Bramble Mike G, Wilson Douglas W, Rutter Matthew D, Saunders Brian P, Hungin A Pali S, East James E

机构信息

South Tyneside District General Hospital, South Shields. UK.

Northern Region Endoscopy Group, South Shields. UK.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):217-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391563. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1391563
PMID:25675176
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Low adenoma detection rates (ADRs) at colonoscopy are linked to significantly higher interval cancer rates, and vary between colonoscopists. Studies demonstrate that lesion detection is improved by: withdrawal time of ≥ 6 minutes; use of hyoscine butylbromide; position change; and rectal retroflexion. We evaluated the feasibility of implementing the above "bundle" of interventions into colonoscopy practice, and the effect on ADR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A longitudinal cohort design was used. Implementation combined central training, local promotion, and feedback. The uptake marker was change in hyoscine butylbromide use. Comparisons were between the 3 months before and the 9 months after the implementation phase, globally, by endoscopy unit and by quartile when colonoscopists were ranked according to baseline ADR. Chi-squared or Fisher's tests were used to evaluate significance.

RESULTS

12 units participated. Global and quartile analyses included data from 118 and 68 colonoscopists and 17 508 and 14 193 procedures respectively. A significant increase in hyoscine butylbromide use was observed globally (54.4 % vs. 15.8 %, P < 0.001), in all endoscopy units (P < 0.001) and quartiles (P < 0.001). A significant increase in ADR was observed globally (18.1 % vs. 16.0 %, P = 0.002) and in the lower two colonoscopist quartiles (P < 0.001), with a nonsignificant increase in the upper middle quartile and a significant fall to 21.5 %. in the upper quartile. The significant variations in ADR among the upper three quartiles disappeared.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, introduction of a simple, inexpensive, evidence-based "bundle" of measures is feasible and is associated with higher global ADR, driven by improvements amongst the poorest performing colonoscopists.

摘要

背景与研究目的

结肠镜检查时低腺瘤检出率(ADR)与间隔期癌症发生率显著升高相关,且不同结肠镜检查医师之间存在差异。研究表明,通过以下方法可提高病变检出率:退镜时间≥6分钟;使用丁溴东莨菪碱;改变体位;直肠反转。我们评估了在结肠镜检查实践中实施上述“综合”干预措施的可行性及其对ADR的影响。

材料与方法

采用纵向队列设计。实施过程包括集中培训、本地推广和反馈。采用丁溴东莨菪碱使用情况的变化作为吸收指标。比较实施阶段前3个月和实施后9个月的数据,整体、按内镜检查单位以及根据基线ADR对结肠镜检查医师进行四分位排名后按四分位进行比较。采用卡方检验或费舍尔检验评估显著性。

结果

12个单位参与研究。整体和四分位分析分别纳入了118名和68名结肠镜检查医师的数据,以及17508例和14193例检查病例。整体、所有内镜检查单位(P<0.001)和四分位(P<0.001)的丁溴东莨菪碱使用量均显著增加。整体ADR显著增加(18.1%对16.0%,P=0.002),较低的两个结肠镜检查医师四分位组也显著增加(P<0.001),中上四分位组增加不显著,而上四分位组显著降至21.5%。上三个四分位组之间ADR的显著差异消失。

结论

在常规临床实践中,引入一套简单、廉价、基于证据的“综合”措施是可行的,并且在表现最差的结肠镜检查医师的改善推动下,与更高的整体ADR相关。

相似文献

1
A multicenter pragmatic study of an evidence-based intervention to improve adenoma detection: the Quality Improvement in Colonoscopy (QIC) study.一项关于基于证据的干预措施以改善腺瘤检测的多中心实用性研究:结肠镜检查质量改进(QIC)研究。
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):217-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391563. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Sustained colonoscopy quality improvement using a simple intervention bundle.采用简单干预包持续改进结肠镜检查质量。
Endoscopy. 2020 Apr;52(4):285-292. doi: 10.1055/a-1098-2101. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.氢溴酸东莨菪碱不能提高结肠镜检查中息肉的检出率:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、临床试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
4
Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.高级腺瘤检出率与非高级腺瘤检出率无关。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1286-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.149. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.一项内镜质量改进计划可提高结直肠腺瘤的检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;108(2):219-26; quiz 227. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.417. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
6
Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).影响结肠镜筛查质量的因素:一项关于腺瘤检出率的前瞻性研究,共纳入 12134 例检查(柏林结肠镜检查项目 3,BECOP-3)。
Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):236-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300167. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
7
Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.结肠镜检查质量的公开报告与内镜医师腺瘤检出率的提高相关。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.058.
8
Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training.腺瘤检出率在结肠镜检查培训期间差异很大。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).结肠镜退镜技术质量与腺瘤检出率的变化(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
10
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of additional tissue sections for diminutive colorectal adenomas pathologically diagnosed as normal mucosa: a retrospective, cross-sectional study in Japan.病理诊断为正常黏膜的微小结直肠腺瘤额外组织切片的有效性:日本的一项回顾性横断面研究
Clin Endosc. 2025 Jul;58(4):577-585. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.265. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
Improving polyp detection at colonoscopy: Non-technological techniques.提高结肠镜检查中息肉的检出率:非技术方法。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):354-367. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.354.
3
Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.
在内镜黏膜切除术中实现高质量切除。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):338-353. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338.
4
Impact of a scalable training program on the quality of colonoscopy performance and risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.可扩展培训计划对结肠镜检查性能质量和结肠镜检查后结直肠癌风险的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Oct;98(4):609-617. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2073. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
5
Image-enhanced endoscopy and endoscopic resection practices in the colon among endoscopists in India.印度内镜医师在结肠进行图像增强内镜检查及内镜切除操作的情况。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):E1181-E1187. doi: 10.1055/a-1914-6197. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Distal attachment device is mandatory for screening-related colonoscopy.远端附件装置是筛查相关结肠镜检查所必需的。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Oct 25;9(11):E1593-E1594. doi: 10.1055/a-1529-6021. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Simple feedback of colonoscopy performance improved the number of adenomas per colonoscopy and serrated polyp detection rate.结肠镜检查操作的简单反馈提高了每次结肠镜检查发现腺瘤的数量以及锯齿状息肉的检出率。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jul;9(7):E1032-E1038. doi: 10.1055/a-1393-5469. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.反馈对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(2):214-223. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0591. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial.标准内镜与 Endocuff 内镜与帽辅助结肠镜检查用于腺瘤检测的随机对照临床试验。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 May;9(4):443-450. doi: 10.1177/2050640620982952. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Internet-Based Patient Education Prior to Colonoscopy: Prospective, Observational Study of a Single Center's Implementation, with Objective Assessment of Bowel Preparation Quality and Patient Satisfaction.结肠镜检查前基于互联网的患者教育:单中心实施的前瞻性观察性研究,对肠道准备质量和患者满意度进行客观评估。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 4;3(6):274-278. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz026. eCollection 2020 Dec.