• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

There is data, and then there is data: only experimental evidence will determine the utility of differential weighting of expert judgment.

作者信息

Bolger Fergus, Rowe Gene

机构信息

Department of Management, Durham University Business School, Durham, UK.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2015 Jan;35(1):21-6. doi: 10.1111/risa.12345.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12345
PMID:25675991
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
There is data, and then there is data: only experimental evidence will determine the utility of differential weighting of expert judgment.
Risk Anal. 2015 Jan;35(1):21-6. doi: 10.1111/risa.12345.
2
A structured expert judgment study for a model of Campylobacter transmission during broiler-chicken processing.一项关于肉鸡加工过程中弯曲杆菌传播模型的结构化专家判断研究。
Risk Anal. 2005 Feb;25(1):109-24. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00571.x.
3
The aggregation of expert judgment: do good things come to those who weight?专家判断的汇总：好事会降临到那些进行加权的人身上吗？
Risk Anal. 2015 Jan;35(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/risa.12272. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
4
A comparison of alternative item weighting strategies on the data gathering component of a clinical skills performance assessment.临床技能表现评估的数据收集部分中替代项目加权策略的比较。
Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10 Suppl):S72-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e1ac.
5
Integrating expert judgment in veterinary epidemiology: example guidance for disease freedom surveillance.整合兽医流行病学中的专家判断：无病自由监测的示例指南。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Apr 1;109(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.019. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
6
Weighting positive versus negative: the fundamental nature of valence asymmetry.权衡正负：价不对称的基本性质。
J Pers. 2013 Apr;81(2):196-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00800.x. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
7
Influence of expert clinical adviser characteristics on opinions about interventional procedures.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Spring;24(2):166-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080239.
8
Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: a test of the expertise defense.专家判断中关于自由意志和道德责任的持续偏见：专业知识辩护的检验。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1722-31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 18.
9
Antecedents of Leader Utilization of Staff Input in Decision-Making Teams.决策团队中领导者利用员工意见的前因。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Mar;77(3):215-242. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2819.
10
The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony.eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction对陪审员评估 eyewitness testimony能力的影响。 需注意，这里的“eyewitness”常见释义为“目击者”“证人” ，“testimony”常见释义为“证词”“证言” ，由于不清楚具体语境，直接保留英文未翻译更合适。完整准确的译文：目击证人专家证据和司法指示对陪审员评估目击证人证词能力的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Jun;33(3):225-36. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9134-z. Epub 2008 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving Beyond Indices: A Systematic Approach Integrating Food System Performance and Characteristics for Comprehensive Food Security Assessment.超越指标：一种整合粮食系统绩效与特征以进行全面粮食安全评估的系统方法。
Foods. 2025 May 21;14(10):1834. doi: 10.3390/foods14101834.
2
Finding Consensus About the Level of Medication Safety in a Hospital Setting: Development and an Example of Application of a Modified Delphi Method.在医院环境中寻找药物安全水平的共识：改良 Delphi 法的制定及其应用实例。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 14;9:630398. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.630398. eCollection 2021.
3
Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.
制定医疗保健决策中结构化专家 elicitation 的参考协议：混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(37):1-124. doi: 10.3310/hta25370.