• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓解政策接受模型:住宅抗震加固个体决策过程分析。

Mitigation Policy Acceptance Model: An Analysis of Individual Decision Making Process toward Residential Seismic Strengthening.

机构信息

Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 30;15(9):1883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091883.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15091883
PMID:30200260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6164328/
Abstract

Mitigation policy is regarded as an effective strategy to achieve the purpose of building health resilience and reducing disaster risk with the current high frequency of environmental event occurrences. To enhance public acceptance of mitigation policy, the issue of decision-making behavior has been a concern of researchers and planners. In the past literature, qualitative measures employed to reveal the behavioral intention of hazard risk mitigation cause restricted outcomes due to the problem of sample representativeness and the fact that quantitative research is restricted to discuss the linear relationship between the two selected variables. The purpose of this article is to attempt to construct a Mitigation Policy Acceptance Model (MPAM) to analyze the behavioral intention of seismic risk mitigation strategies. Based on Dual Processing Theory, affective is conducted as the core variable for constructing two types of thinking processes, and the variables of risk perception, trust and responsibility are selected in MPAM from theories and past research. In this study, the mitigation policy of residential seismic strengthening, adapted in Yongkang District of Tainan, has been conducted as the case study. According to the results, the result of model fit test has confirmed the MPAM framework, and two thinking modes could be associated together when people face a risky decision-making process. The variable of affective is the most effective factor to influence each variable, and a direct effect on intention is also shown in this model. The results could provide suggestions in communication risk strategies for the government.

摘要

缓解政策被认为是实现建设健康弹性和减少灾害风险目的的有效策略,因为当前环境事件的发生频率很高。为了增强公众对缓解政策的接受程度,决策行为问题一直是研究人员和规划者关注的焦点。在过去的文献中,定性措施被用来揭示危险缓解的行为意图,但由于样本代表性的问题以及定量研究仅限于讨论两个选定变量之间的线性关系,因此限制了结果。本文旨在尝试构建一个缓解政策接受模型(MPAM)来分析地震风险缓解策略的行为意图。基于双重处理理论,情感被作为构建两种思维过程的核心变量,并且风险感知、信任和责任等变量是从理论和过去的研究中选择的。在这项研究中,以台南市永康区的住宅抗震加固缓解政策为案例研究。根据结果,模型拟合测试的结果证实了 MPAM 框架,并且当人们面对风险决策过程时,两种思维模式可以联系在一起。情感变量是影响每个变量的最有效因素,并且在这个模型中也显示了对意图的直接影响。研究结果可为政府的风险沟通策略提供建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975c/6164328/f9d760bf3a73/ijerph-15-01883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975c/6164328/f9d760bf3a73/ijerph-15-01883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975c/6164328/f9d760bf3a73/ijerph-15-01883-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mitigation Policy Acceptance Model: An Analysis of Individual Decision Making Process toward Residential Seismic Strengthening.缓解政策接受模型:住宅抗震加固个体决策过程分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 30;15(9):1883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091883.
2
Implementation of equity in resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation using two-stage stochastic programming.使用两阶段随机规划实现区域地震风险缓解资源分配的公平性。
Risk Anal. 2015 Mar;35(3):434-58. doi: 10.1111/risa.12321. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
3
Residents' Disaster Preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan Earthquake: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory.美浓地震后居民的备灾准备:保护动机理论的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 7;15(7):1434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071434.
4
Earthquake-strengthening policy for commercial buildings in small-town New Zealand.新西兰小镇商业建筑的抗震加固政策。
Disasters. 2020 Jan;44(1):179-204. doi: 10.1111/disa.12360. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
A western gray whale mitigation and monitoring program for a 3-D seismic survey, Sakhalin Island, Russia.俄罗斯萨哈林岛一项针对三维地震勘探的西太平洋灰鲸缓解与监测计划。
Environ Monit Assess. 2007 Nov;134(1-3):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9813-0. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
6
Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.天然地震活动和诱发地震活动的地震灾害与风险分析:面对不确定性进行客观评估。
Bull Earthq Eng. 2022;20(6):2825-3069. doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
The Role of Science in Advising the Decision Making Process: A Pathway for Building Effective Climate Change Mitigation Policies in Mexico at the Local Level.科学在为决策过程提供建议中的作用:墨西哥地方层面构建有效气候变化缓解政策的途径。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;13(5):451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050451.
8
Cross-cultural comparisons between the earthquake preparedness models of Taiwan and New Zealand.台湾与新西兰地震防备模式的跨文化比较。
Disasters. 2016 Apr;40(2):327-45. doi: 10.1111/disa.12144. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
9
Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.地震震动与建筑物损坏:近期关于强烈地面震动的证据引发了对建筑物抗震能力的质疑。
Science. 1975 Aug 22;189(4203):601-8. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4203.601.
10
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of Rural Households' Earthquake-Resistant Construction Behavior: Evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China.农村家庭抗震建设行为分析:来自中国平凉和玉溪的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 4;17(23):9079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239079.

本文引用的文献

1
Commonalities between Disaster and Climate Change Risks for Health: A Theoretical Framework.灾害与健康相关的气候变化风险之间的共性:理论框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 16;15(3):538. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030538.
2
Resilience of an Earthquake-Stricken Rural Community in Southwest China: Correlation with Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts.中国西南地区一个遭受地震的农村社区的韧性:与减轻灾害风险工作的相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 27;15(3):407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030407.
3
How Do Communities Use a Participatory Public Health Approach to Build Resilience? The Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project.
社区如何运用参与式公共卫生方法来增强复原力?洛杉矶县社区灾难复原力项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 21;14(10):1267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101267.
4
Cross-cultural comparisons between the earthquake preparedness models of Taiwan and New Zealand.台湾与新西兰地震防备模式的跨文化比较。
Disasters. 2016 Apr;40(2):327-45. doi: 10.1111/disa.12144. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
5
The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence.保护行动决策模型:理论修正与额外证据。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):616-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
6
Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.城市地震灾害:孟加拉国达卡市的感知地震风险和准备情况。
Disasters. 2010 Apr;34(2):337-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01132.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
7
Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes.人们采取措施防范地震风险的原因:对灾害适应属性的认知。
Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1072-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
8
Households' perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment.多灾种环境下家庭感知的个人风险及应对措施
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):539-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x.
9
The concept of resilience revisited.重谈复原力的概念。
Disasters. 2006 Dec;30(4):433-50. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x.
10
Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust.感受与信任:情感对信任的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 May;88(5):736-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736.