Wood Susan K, Wood Christopher S, Lombard Calliandra M, Lee Catherine S, Zhang Xiao-Yan, Finnell Julie E, Valentino Rita J
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Stress Neurobiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina.
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina.
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 1;78(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Coping strategy impacts susceptibility to psychosocial stress. The locus coeruleus (LC) and dorsal raphe (DR) are monoamine nuclei implicated in stress-related disorders. Our goal was to identify genes in these nuclei that distinguish active and passive coping strategies in response to social stress.
Rats were exposed to repeated resident-intruder stress and coping strategy determined. Gene and protein expression in the LC and DR were determined by polymerase chain reaction array and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared between active and passive stress-coping and unstressed rats. The effect of daily interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist before stress on anhedonia was also determined.
Rats exhibited passive or active coping strategies based on a short latency (SL) or longer latency (LL) to assume a defeat posture, respectively. Stress differentially regulated 19 and 26 genes in the LC and DR of SL and LL rats, respectively, many of which encoded for inflammatory factors. Notably, Il-1β was increased in SL and decreased in LL rats in both the LC and DR. Protein changes were generally consistent with a proinflammatory response to stress in SL rats selectively. Stress produced anhedonia selectively in SL rats and this was prevented by IL-1 receptor antagonist, consistent with a role for IL-1β in stress vulnerability.
This study highlighted distinctions in gene expression related to coping strategy in response to social stress. Passive coping was associated with a bias toward proinflammatory processes, particularly IL-1β, whereas active coping and resistance to stress-related pathology was associated with suppression of inflammatory processes.
应对策略会影响对心理社会压力的易感性。蓝斑(LC)和中缝背核(DR)是与应激相关障碍有关的单胺能核团。我们的目标是在这些核团中鉴定出能够区分应对社会压力时主动和被动应对策略的基因。
将大鼠暴露于反复的居住者-入侵者应激中,并确定其应对策略。通过聚合酶链反应阵列和酶联免疫吸附测定法测定LC和DR中的基因和蛋白质表达,并在主动和被动应激应对组与未应激的大鼠之间进行比较。还确定了应激前每日注射白细胞介素(IL)-1受体拮抗剂对快感缺失的影响。
大鼠分别根据短潜伏期(SL)或长潜伏期(LL)呈现被动或主动应对策略,以采取战败姿势。应激分别在SL和LL大鼠的LC和DR中差异调节了19个和26个基因,其中许多基因编码炎症因子。值得注意的是,LC和DR中的SL大鼠Il-1β增加,而LL大鼠中则减少。蛋白质变化通常与SL大鼠中对应激的促炎反应一致。应激在SL大鼠中选择性地产生快感缺失,而IL-1受体拮抗剂可预防这种情况,这与IL-1β在应激易感性中的作用一致。
本研究突出了应对社会压力时与应对策略相关的基因表达差异。被动应对与促炎过程,特别是IL-1β的偏向有关,而主动应对和对与应激相关病理的抵抗与炎症过程的抑制有关。