• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究多目标视觉搜索中的知觉定势和概念定势偏差。

Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.

作者信息

Biggs Adam T, Adamo Stephen H, Dowd Emma Wu, Mitroff Stephen R

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, B203 LSRC, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA,

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):844-55. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0822-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0822-0
PMID:25678271
Abstract

Visual search is a common practice conducted countless times every day, and one important aspect of visual search is that multiple targets can appear in a single search array. For example, an X-ray image of airport luggage could contain both a water bottle and a gun. Searchers are more likely to miss additional targets after locating a first target in multiple-target searches, which presents a potential problem: If airport security officers were to find a water bottle, would they then be more likely to miss a gun? One hypothetical cause of multiple-target search errors is that searchers become biased to detect additional targets that are similar to a found target, and therefore become less likely to find additional targets that are dissimilar to the first target. This particular hypothesis has received theoretical, but little empirical, support. In the present study, we tested the bounds of this idea by utilizing "big data" obtained from the mobile application Airport Scanner. Multiple-target search errors were substantially reduced when the two targets were identical, suggesting that the first-found target did indeed create biases during subsequent search. Further analyses delineated the nature of the biases, revealing both a perceptual set bias (i.e., a bias to find additional targets with features similar to those of the first-found target) and a conceptual set bias (i.e., a bias to find additional targets with a conceptual relationship to the first-found target). These biases are discussed in terms of the implications for visual-search theories and applications for professional visual searchers.

摘要

视觉搜索是一种每天都会进行无数次的常见行为,而视觉搜索的一个重要方面是,多个目标可能会出现在单个搜索阵列中。例如,机场行李的X光图像可能既包含一个水瓶又包含一把枪。在多目标搜索中,搜索者在找到第一个目标后更有可能错过其他目标,这就带来了一个潜在问题:如果机场安检人员找到了一个水瓶,那么他们是否更有可能错过一把枪?多目标搜索错误的一个假设原因是,搜索者会偏向于检测与已找到目标相似的其他目标,因此找到与第一个目标不同的其他目标的可能性就会降低。这一特定假设得到了理论支持,但实证支持较少。在本研究中,我们通过利用从移动应用程序“机场扫描仪”获得的“大数据”来测试这一观点的局限性。当两个目标相同时,多目标搜索错误大幅减少,这表明首先找到的目标在后续搜索中确实产生了偏差。进一步的分析明确了偏差的性质,揭示了一种知觉定势偏差(即偏向于找到具有与首先找到的目标相似特征的其他目标)和一种概念定势偏差(即偏向于找到与首先找到的目标具有概念关系的其他目标)。将根据这些偏差对视觉搜索理论的影响以及对专业视觉搜索者的应用来进行讨论。

相似文献

1
Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.研究多目标视觉搜索中的知觉定势和概念定势偏差。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):844-55. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0822-0.
2
Perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets.视觉搜索多个目标时的感知相似性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Feb;173:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
3
A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.历史重演:将多目标视觉搜索分开进行可减少对第二个目标的漏报错误。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Jun;20(2):112-25. doi: 10.1037/xap0000014. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
4
Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment.快速评估预测机场安检员视觉搜索能力
Hum Factors. 2018 Mar;60(2):201-211. doi: 10.1177/0018720817743886. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria.非专业搜索者与专业搜索者在多目标视觉搜索表现上因决策标准而产生的差异。
Br J Psychol. 2015 Nov;106(4):551-63. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12096. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers.非专业和专业视觉搜索者在多目标搜索准确性方面的不同预测因素。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1335-48. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.859715. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
7
The effect of categorical superiority in subsequent search misses.类别优势对后续搜索遗漏的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Sep;219:103375. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103375. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
8
The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.超稀有物品效应:对极其罕见物品的视觉搜索极易出错。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):284-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504221. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
9
Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.按物体类别进行视觉搜索的快速引导
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):50-60. doi: 10.1037/a0033228. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
10
Targets Need Their Own Personal Space: Effects of Clutter on Multiple-Target Search Accuracy.目标需要它们自己的个人空间:杂乱对多目标搜索准确性的影响。
Perception. 2015;44(10):1203-14. doi: 10.1177/0301006615594921. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Job stress and patient safety culture: a qualitative study among hospital nurses in Palestine.工作压力与患者安全文化:巴勒斯坦医院护士的定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 24;24(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02993-2.
2
Assessing satisfaction of search in virtual mammograms for experienced and novice searchers.评估经验丰富和新手搜索者对虚拟乳腺X线摄影搜索的满意度。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 1):S11917. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11917. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
3
The Manifestation of Incidental Findings in Different Experimental Visual Search Paradigms.
不同实验性视觉搜索范式中偶发发现的表现
Psychol Russ. 2022 Dec 30;15(4):140-158. doi: 10.11621/pir.2022.0409. eCollection 2022.
4
From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.从“搜索满足”到“后续搜索遗漏”:放射学和认知科学中多目标搜索错误的综述。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Aug 28;6(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00318-w.
5
Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback.期望很高:在没有反馈的情况下,初始指令中的细微差异会对视觉搜索产生重大影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 19;6(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00286-1.
6
Iowa Gambling Task and Distortion in Perception of Body Image Among Adolescent Women With Eating Disorders.爱荷华赌博任务与饮食失调青少年女性身体形象认知偏差
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;11:2223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02223. eCollection 2020.
7
The Role of Working Memory in Dual-Target Visual Search.工作记忆在双目标视觉搜索中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01673. eCollection 2019.
8
No Effect of the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex tDCS in Dual-Target Visual Search.右侧顶叶后皮质经颅直流电刺激对双目标视觉搜索无影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02112. eCollection 2018.
9
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.使用快速序列视觉呈现来测量特定集合捕获,这是多任务处理时注意力分散的一个结果。
J Vis Exp. 2018 Aug 29(138):58053. doi: 10.3791/58053.