Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto, M5S 3B1 Ontario, Canada.
Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Environ Int. 2015 May;78:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Rockström et al. (2009a, 2009b) have warned that humanity must reduce anthropogenic impacts defined by nine planetary boundaries if "unacceptable global change" is to be avoided. Chemical pollution was identified as one of those boundaries for which continued impacts could erode the resilience of ecosystems and humanity. The central concept of the planetary boundary (or boundaries) for chemical pollution (PBCP or PBCPs) is that the Earth has a finite assimilative capacity for chemical pollution, which includes persistent, as well as readily degradable chemicals released at local to regional scales, which in aggregate threaten ecosystem and human viability. The PBCP allows humanity to explicitly address the increasingly global aspects of chemical pollution throughout a chemical's life cycle and the need for a global response of internationally coordinated control measures. We submit that sufficient evidence shows stresses on ecosystem and human health at local to global scales, suggesting that conditions are transgressing the safe operating space delimited by a PBCP. As such, current local to global pollution control measures are insufficient. However, while the PBCP is an important conceptual step forward, at this point single or multiple PBCPs are challenging to operationalize due to the extremely large number of commercial chemicals or mixtures of chemicals that cause myriad adverse effects to innumerable species and ecosystems, and the complex linkages between emissions, environmental concentrations, exposures and adverse effects. As well, the normative nature of a PBCP presents challenges of negotiating pollution limits amongst societal groups with differing viewpoints. Thus, a combination of approaches is recommended as follows: develop indicators of chemical pollution, for both control and response variables, that will aid in quantifying a PBCP(s) and gauging progress towards reducing chemical pollution; develop new technologies and technical and social approaches to mitigate global chemical pollution that emphasize a preventative approach; coordinate pollution control and sustainability efforts; and facilitate implementation of multiple (and potentially decentralized) control efforts involving scientists, civil society, government, non-governmental organizations and international bodies.
罗克斯特罗姆等人(2009a,2009b)警告说,如果要避免“不可接受的全球变化”,人类必须减少由九个行星边界定义的人为影响。化学污染被确定为其中一个边界,如果继续造成影响,可能会破坏生态系统和人类的恢复力。化学污染的行星边界(或边界)(PBCP 或 PBCPs)的核心概念是,地球对化学污染具有有限的同化能力,这包括在局部到区域尺度上释放的持久性和易降解的化学物质,这些化学物质总体上威胁着生态系统和人类的生存能力。PBCP 允许人类在整个化学物质的生命周期中明确解决化学污染日益全球化的问题,以及需要采取国际协调控制措施的全球应对措施。我们认为,有足够的证据表明,在地方到全球范围内,生态系统和人类健康受到压力,这表明情况正在突破由 PBCP 划定的安全运行空间。因此,目前的地方到全球污染控制措施是不够的。然而,尽管 PBCP 是向前迈出的重要概念性一步,但由于引起无数物种和生态系统无数不利影响的商业化学物质或化学物质混合物的数量极其庞大,以及排放、环境浓度、暴露和不利影响之间的复杂联系,目前单一或多个 PBCP 难以实施。此外,PBCP 的规范性性质也给具有不同观点的社会群体之间协商污染限制带来了挑战。因此,建议采取以下综合方法:开发化学污染的指标,包括控制和响应变量,这将有助于量化 PBCP(s)并衡量减少化学污染的进展;开发新技术和技术及社会方法,以减轻全球化学污染,强调预防方法;协调污染控制和可持续性努力;并促进涉及科学家、民间社会、政府、非政府组织和国际机构的多个(和潜在分散的)控制工作的实施。