• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义丰富性与衰老:词汇判断任务中特征数量的影响。

Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.

作者信息

Robert Christelle, Rico Duarte Liliana

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Santé et Qualité de Vie EA4139, University of Bordeaux, 3 place de la Victoire, 33076, Bordeaux, France.

University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Apr;45(2):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9352-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-015-9352-8
PMID:25680348
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether the effect of semantic richness in visual word recognition (i.e., words with a rich semantic representation are faster to recognize than words with a poorer semantic representation), is changed with aging. Semantic richness was investigated by manipulating the number of features of words (NOF), i.e., the number of characteristics that describe the meaning of words. Half of the words had a high NOF and the other half had a low NOF. Young adults (19.6 years) and older adults (66.3 years) performed a lexical decision task. An interaction was found between age group and NOF on word latencies. More precisely, a facilitatory effect of NOF was observed for the young adults, but not for the older ones. These data are consistent with the assumption of an age-related decline in feedback activation from semantics to orthography.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验视觉单词识别中语义丰富性的影响(即语义表征丰富的单词比语义表征较差的单词识别速度更快)是否会随着年龄增长而改变。通过操纵单词的特征数量(NOF)来研究语义丰富性,即描述单词意义的特征数量。一半的单词具有高NOF,另一半具有低NOF。年轻成年人(19.6岁)和年长成年人(66.3岁)进行了词汇判断任务。在单词潜伏期上发现年龄组和NOF之间存在交互作用。更确切地说,观察到NOF对年轻成年人有促进作用,但对年长成年人没有。这些数据与从语义到正字法的反馈激活随年龄下降的假设一致。

相似文献

1
Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.语义丰富性与衰老:词汇判断任务中特征数量的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Apr;45(2):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9352-8.
2
Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.词汇判断中的语义丰富性效应:反馈的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1148-67. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0536-0.
3
Get rich quick: the signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition.快速致富:信号响应程序揭示了视觉单词识别过程中语义丰富效应的时间进程。
Cognition. 2014 May;131(2):216-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
4
[The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].[语义丰富度对情绪词汇视觉识别的影响]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/a0027083.
5
The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.反馈语义在视觉单词识别中的作用:词汇判断和命名任务中的特征数量效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):542-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196311.
6
Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.映射语义空间:属性规范与语义丰富度
Cogn Process. 2020 Nov;21(4):637-649. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00933-y. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
Semantic richness, concreteness, and object domain: an electrophysiological study.语义丰富性、具体性与客体领域:一项电生理研究。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Jun;67(2):117-29. doi: 10.1037/a0029807. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
8
Lexical decision with pseudohomophones and reading in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: A double dissociation.原发性进行性失语语义变异型中假性同音异形词的词汇判断与阅读:一种双重分离。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jun;86:45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
Number-of-features effects and semantic processing.特征数量效应与语义处理
Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):842-55. doi: 10.3758/bf03196439.
10
Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.概念形成过程中的词汇因素:语义表征与其相应的语音和正字法词汇形式之间的关系。
Mem Cognit. 2016 May;44(4):519-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0576-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Aging Effects on Phonological and Semantic Priming in the Tip-of-the-Tongue: Evidence From a Two-Step Approach.衰老对舌尖现象中语音和语义启动的影响:来自两步法的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 27;11:338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00338. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts.共享特征主导具体概念的语义丰富性效应。
J Mem Lang. 2009 Jan;60(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.001.
2
Aging and lexical inhibition: the effect of orthographic neighborhood frequency in young and older adults.衰老与词汇抑制:正字法邻域频率对年轻人和老年人的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Nov;62(6):P340-2. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.6.p340.
3
Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things.大量生物和非生物的语义特征生成规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):547-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03192726.
4
Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts.用于处理具体和抽象概念的不同脑系统。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jun;17(6):905-17. doi: 10.1162/0898929054021102.
5
Age differences in central (semantic) and peripheral processing: the importance of considering both response times and errors.中枢(语义)和外周加工中的年龄差异:同时考虑反应时间和错误的重要性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004 Sep;59(5):P210-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/59.5.p210.
6
Number-of-features effects and semantic processing.特征数量效应与语义处理
Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):842-55. doi: 10.3758/bf03196439.
7
The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.反馈语义在视觉单词识别中的作用:词汇判断和命名任务中的特征数量效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):542-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196311.
8
Perception is a two-way junction: feedback semantics in word recognition.感知是一个双向连接:单词识别中的反馈语义。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):545-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03196190.
9
Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory.语义记忆中特征相关性的进一步证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1999 Dec;53(4):360-373. doi: 10.1037/h0087323.
10
Age-linked declines in retrieving orthographic knowledge: empirical, practical, and theoretical implications.与年龄相关的正字法知识提取能力下降:实证、实践及理论意义
Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):647-62. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.647.