Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, King's Meadow Campus Lenton Lane, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, U.K.
Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, OX3 7BN, U.K.
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jul;173(1):227-34. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13729. Epub 2015 May 26.
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease in older people, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Oral corticosteroids are usually effective but the side-effects are thought to contribute to the high morbidity and mortality rate. Treatment with oral tetracyclines may be effective but high-quality, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm this.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of two strategies for treating BP.
This is a two-arm, parallel group, 52-week RCT comparing doxycycline with prednisolone for initial treatment of BP. Dose is fixed for the initial 6 weeks of treatment (doxycycline 200 mg daily; prednisolone 0.5 mg kg(-1) daily), after which it can be adjusted according to need. A total of 256 patients with BP will be recruited in the U.K. and Germany.
The primary outcomes are: (i) effectiveness (assessor-blinded blister count at 6 weeks) and (ii) safety [proportion of patients experiencing ≥ grade 3 adverse events (i.e. severe, life: threatening or fatal) related to trial medication during the year of follow-up]. Primary effectiveness analysis will be an assessment of whether doxycycline can be considered noninferior to prednisolone after 6 weeks of treatment. Primary safety analysis is a superiority analysis at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include longer-term assessment of effectiveness, relapse rates, the proportion of patients experiencing any grade of adverse events related to treatment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
The trial will provide good evidence for whether the strategy of starting BP treatment with doxycycline is a useful alternative to prednisolone.
大疱性类天疱疮(BP)是老年人中最常见的自身免疫性水疱病,与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。口服皮质类固醇通常有效,但副作用被认为是导致高发病率和死亡率的原因之一。口服四环素类药物治疗可能有效,但需要高质量的随机对照试验(RCT)来证实这一点。
比较两种治疗 BP 的策略的有效性和安全性。
这是一项为期 52 周的、两臂平行分组的 RCT,比较多西环素与泼尼松龙治疗 BP 的初始治疗。在最初的 6 周治疗中剂量固定(多西环素 200mg 每日;泼尼松龙 0.5mg/kg 每日),之后可以根据需要进行调整。在英国和德国将招募 256 名 BP 患者。
主要结局是:(i)有效性(评估者盲法 6 周时的水疱计数)和(ii)安全性[在随访的 1 年内因试验药物发生≥3 级不良事件(即严重、危及生命或致命)的患者比例]。主要有效性分析将评估在 6 周治疗后多西环素是否可被认为不劣于泼尼松龙。主要安全性分析是 12 个月时的优效性分析。次要结局包括长期有效性评估、复发率、因治疗相关的任何级别不良事件的患者比例、生活质量和成本效益。
该试验将为 BP 治疗起始时使用多西环素的策略是否是泼尼松龙的有用替代方案提供良好的证据。