Chamberlain Lisa M, Holt-Casper Dolly, Gonzalez-Juarrero Mercedes, Grainger David W
Cell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523.
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5820.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Sep;103(9):2864-74. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35415. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
Inflammatory responses to biomaterials heavily influence the environment surrounding implanted devices, often producing foreign-body reactions. The macrophage is a key immunomodulatory cell type consistently associated with implanted biomaterials and routinely used in short-term in vitro cell studies of biomaterials aiming to reproduce host responses. Inconsistencies within these studies, including differently sourced cells, different durations of culture, and assessment of different activation markers, lead to many conflicting results in vitro that confound consistency and conclusions. We hypothesize that different experimentally popular monocyte-macrophage cell types have intrinsic in vitro culture-specific differences that yield conflicting results. Recent studies demonstrate changes in cultured macrophage cytokine expression over time, leading to the hypothesis that changes in macrophage phenotype also occur in response to extended culture. Here, macrophage cells of different transformed and primary-derived origins were cultured for 21 days on model polymer biomaterials. Cell type-based differences in morphology and cytokine/chemokine expression as well as changes in cell surface biomarkers associated with differentiation stage, activation state, and adhesion were compared. Results reflect consistent macrophage development toward an M2 phenotype via up-regulation of the macrophage mannose receptor for all cell types following 21-day extended culture. Significantly, implanted biomaterials experiencing the foreign-body response and encapsulation in vivo often elicit a shift toward an analogous M2 macrophage phenotype. In vitro "default" of macrophage cultures, regardless of lineage, to this M2 state in the presence of biomaterials at long culture periods is not recognized, but has important implications to in vitro modeling of in vivo host response.
对生物材料的炎症反应会严重影响植入装置周围的环境,常常引发异物反应。巨噬细胞是一种关键的免疫调节细胞类型,一直与植入的生物材料相关联,并且在旨在重现宿主反应的生物材料短期体外细胞研究中经常被使用。这些研究存在不一致之处,包括细胞来源不同、培养时间不同以及对不同激活标志物的评估,导致体外出现许多相互矛盾的结果,这使得一致性和结论变得混乱。我们假设,不同的实验常用单核细胞 - 巨噬细胞类型在体外培养中存在内在的特异性差异,从而产生相互矛盾的结果。最近的研究表明,培养的巨噬细胞细胞因子表达会随时间变化,这导致了另一种假设,即巨噬细胞表型的变化也会因长时间培养而发生。在此,将不同转化来源和原代来源的巨噬细胞在模型聚合物生物材料上培养21天。比较了基于细胞类型的形态学、细胞因子/趋化因子表达差异以及与分化阶段、激活状态和黏附相关的细胞表面生物标志物的变化。结果表明,在延长培养21天后,所有细胞类型的巨噬细胞均通过上调巨噬细胞甘露糖受体向M2表型持续发展。值得注意的是,在体内经历异物反应和包囊化的植入生物材料通常会引发向类似M2巨噬细胞表型的转变。在长时间培养且存在生物材料的情况下,巨噬细胞培养物无论谱系如何都会在体外“默认”为这种M2状态,这一点尚未得到认识,但对体内宿主反应的体外建模具有重要意义。