Graf Jodi, Bomb Kartik, Trautmann-Rodriguez Michael, Jarai Bader M, Gill Nicole, Kloxin April M, Fromen Catherine A
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.
Front Biomater Sci. 2024;3. doi: 10.3389/fbiom.2024.1399448. Epub 2024 May 22.
Macrophages are phagocytic innate immune cells capable of phenotypical switching in response to the local microenvironment. Studies often use either primary macrophages or immortalized cell lines for hypothesis testing, therapeutic assessment, and biomaterial evaluation without carefully considering the potential effects of cell source and tissue of origin, which strongly influence macrophage response. Surprisingly, limited information is available about how, under similar stimuli, immortalized cell lines and primary cells respond in both phenotypical and functional changes. To address this need, in this work, we cultured immortalized macrophage cell lines derived from different origins ( blood, lung, peritoneal) to understand and compare macrophage phenotypical responses, including polarization and plasticity, morphological changes, and phagocytic functionalities of different cell lines, as well as compared primary macrophages extracted from peritoneal and bone marrow to their immortalized cell line counterparts. We found significant differences in baseline expression of different markers (e.g., CD86, MHCII, CD206, and EGR2) amongst different cell lines, which further influence both polarization and repolarization of the cells, in addition to their phagocytic functionality. Additionally, we observed that, while RAW 264.7 cells behave similarly to the primary bone marrow-derived macrophages, there are noticeable phenotypical and functional differences in cell line (IC-21) and primary peritoneal macrophages, highlighting tissue-specific differences in macrophage response amongst cell lines and primary cells. Moving to 3D culture in well-defined biomaterials, blood-derived primary and cell line macrophages were encapsulated within hydrogel-based synthetic extracellular matrices and their polarization profiles and cell morphologies were compared. Macrophages exhibited less pronounced polarization during 3D culture in these compliant, soft materials compared to 2D culture on rigid, tissue culture plastic plates. Overall, our findings highlight origin-specific differences in macrophage response, and therefore, careful considerations must be made to identify the appropriate cell source for the application of interest.
巨噬细胞是具有吞噬作用的固有免疫细胞,能够根据局部微环境进行表型转换。研究通常使用原代巨噬细胞或永生化细胞系进行假设检验、治疗评估和生物材料评价,却没有仔细考虑细胞来源和组织起源的潜在影响,而这些因素会强烈影响巨噬细胞的反应。令人惊讶的是,关于在相似刺激下永生化细胞系和原代细胞在表型和功能变化方面如何反应的信息有限。为满足这一需求,在本研究中,我们培养了源自不同来源(血液、肺、腹膜)的永生化巨噬细胞系,以了解和比较巨噬细胞的表型反应,包括极化和可塑性、形态变化以及不同细胞系的吞噬功能,并将从腹膜和骨髓中提取的原代巨噬细胞与其对应的永生化细胞系进行比较。我们发现不同细胞系之间不同标志物(如CD86、MHCII、CD206和EGR2)的基线表达存在显著差异,这除了影响细胞的吞噬功能外,还进一步影响细胞的极化和再极化。此外,我们观察到,虽然RAW 264.7细胞的行为与原代骨髓来源的巨噬细胞相似,但细胞系(IC - 21)和原代腹膜巨噬细胞在表型和功能上存在明显差异,突出了细胞系和原代细胞之间巨噬细胞反应的组织特异性差异。在明确的生物材料中进行三维培养时,将血液来源的原代和细胞系巨噬细胞封装在基于水凝胶的合成细胞外基质中,并比较它们的极化特征和细胞形态。与在刚性的组织培养塑料板上进行二维培养相比,巨噬细胞在这些顺应性好、柔软的材料中进行三维培养时表现出不太明显的极化。总体而言,我们的研究结果突出了巨噬细胞反应中起源特异性差异,因此,必须谨慎考虑以确定适用于相关应用的合适细胞来源。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
2025-1
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2025-6
ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2023-11-20
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023-11
Clin Sci (Lond). 2023-8-14
Exploration (Beijing). 2022-2-25
Nat Rev Chem. 2022-10