Dellon E S, Erichsen R, Baron J A, Shaheen N J, Vyberg M, Sorensen H T, Pedersen L
Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;41(7):662-70. doi: 10.1111/apt.13129. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
National population-based medical registries in Denmark offer a unique opportunity to study eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) epidemiology.
To determine the incidence and prevalence of EoE in Denmark, and evaluate whether an increase in endoscopy with biopsy activity explains changes in these trends.
The Danish National Pathology Registry, Danish National Patient Registry and Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics were queried from 1997 to 2012. Using an EoE case-finding algorithm validated for Danish patients, EoE cases were identified during each year of the study period; we also identified all patients with oesophageal eosinophilia. Using the known population of Demark, the annual incidence and prevalence of EoE were determined. We also determined the number of oesophageal biopsies performed each year in Denmark, and compared the change in the incidence rate to the change in biopsy rate.
Between 1997 and 2012, 1708 patients had oesophageal eosinophilia, of whom 844 met the case definition of EoE. There were seven new cases of EoE in 1997 and 145 new cases in 2012, corresponding to a 19.5-fold increase in incidence (0.13/100 000 to 2.6/100 000). There were 769 total cases in 2012 (prevalence of 13.8/100 000). Over the same time frame, the oesophageal biopsy rate increased only 1.9 fold, from 91.1/100 000 to 175.3/100 000.
The incidence and prevalence of EoE markedly increased in Denmark over the past 15 years. This increase far outpaced the increase in oesophageal biopsy utilisation, indicating that changes in the frequency of EoE are not due to changes in biopsy rates alone.
丹麦基于全国人口的医学登记系统为研究嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)的流行病学提供了独特的机会。
确定丹麦EoE的发病率和患病率,并评估内镜活检活动的增加是否能解释这些趋势的变化。
查询了1997年至2012年丹麦国家病理登记系统、丹麦国家患者登记系统和丹麦药品统计登记系统。使用针对丹麦患者验证的EoE病例发现算法,在研究期间的每年识别EoE病例;我们还识别了所有食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多的患者。利用丹麦已知人口,确定EoE的年发病率和患病率。我们还确定了丹麦每年进行的食管活检数量,并将发病率的变化与活检率的变化进行比较。
1997年至2012年期间,1708例患者有食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多,其中844例符合EoE的病例定义。1997年有7例EoE新病例,2012年有145例新病例,发病率增加了19.5倍(从0.13/10万增至2.6/10万)。2012年共有769例病例(患病率为13.8/10万)。在同一时间段内,食管活检率仅增加了1.9倍,从91.1/10万增至175.3/10万。
在过去15年中,丹麦EoE的发病率和患病率显著增加。这种增加远远超过了食管活检使用率的增加,表明EoE发病率的变化并非仅由活检率的变化所致。