Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):1165-1172. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab349.
Conventional blood cultures were compared to plasma cell-free DNA-based 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detection and identification of potential pathogens in patients with sepsis.
Plasma was prospectively collected from 60 adult patients with sepsis presenting to the Mayo Clinic (Minnesota) Emergency Department from March through August 2019. Results of routine clinical blood cultures were compared to those of 16S rRNA gene NGS.
Nineteen (32%) subjects had positive blood cultures, of which 13 yielded gram-negative bacilli, 5 gram-positive cocci, and 1 both gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci. 16S rRNA gene NGS findings were concordant in 11. For the remaining 8, 16S rRNA gene NGS results yielded discordant detections (n = 5) or were negative (n = 3). Interestingly, Clostridium species were additionally detected by 16S rRNA gene NGS in 3 of the 6 subjects with gastrointestinal sources of gram-negative bacteremia and none of the 3 subjects with urinary sources of gram-negative bacteremia. In the 41 remaining subjects, 16S rRNA gene NGS detected at least 1 potentially pathogenic organism in 17. In 15, the detected microorganism clinically correlated with the patient's syndrome. In 17 subjects with a clinically defined infectious syndrome, neither test was positive; in the remaining 7 subjects, a noninfectious cause of clinical presentation was identified.
16S rRNA gene NGS may be useful for detecting bacteria in plasma of septic patients. In some cases of gram-negative sepsis, it may be possible to pinpoint a gastrointestinal or urinary source of sepsis based on the profile of bacteria detected in plasma.
在脓毒症患者中,将常规血培养与基于血浆无细胞游离 DNA 的 16S 核糖体 RNA(rRNA) 基因聚合酶链反应(PCR)/下一代测序(NGS) 进行比较,以检测和鉴定潜在的病原体。
2019 年 3 月至 8 月,前瞻性采集了来自梅奥诊所(明尼苏达州)急诊科的 60 例脓毒症成年患者的血浆。将常规临床血培养的结果与 16S rRNA 基因 NGS 的结果进行比较。
19 例(32%)患者血培养阳性,其中 13 例检出革兰阴性杆菌,5 例检出革兰阳性球菌,1 例同时检出革兰阴性杆菌和革兰阳性球菌。16S rRNA 基因 NGS 结果在 11 例中是一致的。对于其余 8 例,16S rRNA 基因 NGS 结果产生了不一致的检测结果(5 例)或为阴性(3 例)。有趣的是,在 6 例胃肠道来源的革兰阴性菌血症患者中,16S rRNA 基因 NGS 还额外检测到梭菌属,而在 3 例尿源革兰阴性菌血症患者中均未检测到。在其余 41 例患者中,16S rRNA 基因 NGS 在 17 例中至少检测到 1 种潜在的病原体。在 15 例中,检测到的微生物与患者的综合征具有临床相关性。在 17 例具有临床定义的感染综合征的患者中,两种检测均为阴性;在其余 7 例患者中,确定了导致临床表现的非感染性原因。
16S rRNA 基因 NGS 可能有助于检测脓毒症患者血浆中的细菌。在某些革兰阴性菌脓毒症的情况下,可能可以根据在血浆中检测到的细菌谱来确定脓毒症的胃肠道或尿源。