Suppr超能文献

AJG522与标准聚乙二醇+电解质作为结肠镜检查肠道准备的前瞻性随机对照试验。

A prospective randomized controlled trial of AJG522 versus standard PEG+E as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

作者信息

Sagawa Toshihiko, Sato Ken, Tomizawa Taku, Mizuide Masafumi, Yasuoka Hidetoshi, Shimoyama Yasuyuki, Kuribayashi Shiko, Kakizaki Satoru, Kawamura Osamu, Kusano Motoyasu, Yamada Masanobu

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.

Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:521756. doi: 10.1155/2015/521756. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Abstract

Polyethylene glycol- (PEG-) based bowel preparations for colonoscopies are often poorly tolerated due to the large volumes of fluid intake required. We compared low-volume "modified" PEG + ascorbic acid (AJG522) with standard PEG with electrolytes (PEG+E) in addition to a stimulant laxative and an agent to improve bowel function for the bowel cleansing before colonoscopy to evaluate its efficacy, safety, and acceptability. Outpatients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy were randomized to receive either AJG522 or PEG+E. Bowel cleansing conditions were assessed via macroscopic fecal findings by blinded and independent investigators. A survey of the patients' feedback regarding the preparation was conducted by questionnaire. Successful cleansing was achieved in all cases, except for 4 cases in the PEG+E group, at 3 hours after taking the preparation. The fecal properties were significantly clearer in the AJG522 group than in the PEG+E group at 2 hours after taking each preparation (P=0.013). Although the total liquid volume of the bowel preparation was not reduced, the AJG522 preparation could significantly reduce the required volume of the preparation (P<0.0001). Moreover, the patients in the AJG522 group had better acceptability (P=0.010). There were no significant differences in the safety profiles between groups (UMIN000013892).

摘要

用于结肠镜检查的基于聚乙二醇(PEG)的肠道准备剂,由于需要大量摄入液体,耐受性往往较差。我们将小体积的“改良”PEG+抗坏血酸(AJG522)与标准的含电解质PEG(PEG+E)进行了比较,此外还使用了一种刺激性泻药和一种改善肠道功能的药物,用于结肠镜检查前的肠道清洁,以评估其有效性、安全性和可接受性。计划接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者被随机分为接受AJG522或PEG+E组。由盲法和独立的研究人员通过宏观粪便检查结果评估肠道清洁情况。通过问卷调查对患者关于准备工作的反馈进行了调查。除PEG+E组的4例患者外,所有病例在服用准备剂3小时后均实现了成功清洁。在服用每种准备剂2小时后,AJG522组的粪便性质明显比PEG+E组更清洁(P=0.013)。虽然肠道准备剂的总液体量没有减少,但AJG522准备剂可显著减少所需的准备剂量(P<0.0001)。此外,AJG522组的患者具有更好的可接受性(P=0.010)。两组之间的安全性概况没有显著差异(UMIN000013892)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad1b/4320929/d9cab0356632/BMRI2015-521756.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验