• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续输注H2受体拮抗剂治疗的批判性综述。

A critical review of continuous infusion H2 receptor therapy.

作者信息

Rovers J P, Souney P F

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1989 Aug;17(8):814-21. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198908000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-198908000-00019
PMID:2568898
Abstract

Recent studies suggest that continuous infusions of H2-receptor antagonists may be more effective than intermittent iv therapy to control gastric pH for the prevention of stress ulcers. Infusions of cimetidine, ranitidine, and famotidine have been shown either to have a beneficial clinical effect, to control gastric acid secretion, to maintain gastric pH greater than 4, or to have pharmacokinetic properties similar to intermittent doses. In addition, some evidence suggests that continuous infusions may permit the use of lower doses, leading to cost savings. However, as yet there have been no trials that directly compare continuous and intermittent regimens and show improved outcomes with a continuous regimen. Since candidates for parenteral administration of H2-receptor antagonists are most common in the ICU, several practical issues must be addressed. Patients who receive total parenteral nutrition (TPN) may be suitable candidates for continuous infusions of H2-blockers since these agents can be given in the same container as TPN solutions. These patients also usually have a parenteral access site and infusion pump dedicated to TPN administration. In other patients, drug incompatibilities, limited iv access lines, or a lack of infusion pumps may require frequent interruptions of the infusion in order to administer additional medications, which may lead to a loss of gastric pH control. In most patients, administration of an H2-blocker regimen which maintains consistent pH control after intermittent administration may be the most practical method by which to administer these agents.

摘要

近期研究表明,持续输注H2受体拮抗剂在控制胃内pH值以预防应激性溃疡方面可能比间歇性静脉治疗更有效。已证实,输注西咪替丁、雷尼替丁和法莫替丁要么具有有益的临床效果,要么能控制胃酸分泌、维持胃内pH值大于4,要么具有与间歇性给药相似的药代动力学特性。此外,一些证据表明持续输注可能允许使用更低剂量,从而节省费用。然而,尚无直接比较持续给药方案和间歇性给药方案并显示持续给药方案能改善预后的试验。由于接受肠外给予H2受体拮抗剂的患者在重症监护病房最为常见,因此必须解决几个实际问题。接受全胃肠外营养(TPN)的患者可能是持续输注H2阻滞剂的合适人选,因为这些药物可与TPN溶液在同一容器中给予。这些患者通常也有用于TPN给药的肠外通路部位和输液泵。在其他患者中,药物不相容、静脉通路有限或缺乏输液泵可能需要频繁中断输注以便给予其他药物,这可能导致胃内pH值控制不佳。在大多数患者中,采用间歇性给药后能维持一致pH值控制的H2阻滞剂给药方案可能是给予这些药物最实用的方法。

相似文献

1
A critical review of continuous infusion H2 receptor therapy.持续输注H2受体拮抗剂治疗的批判性综述。
Crit Care Med. 1989 Aug;17(8):814-21. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198908000-00019.
2
A controlled comparison of continuous ranitidine and intermittent famotidine infusions on gastric pH.雷尼替丁持续输注与法莫替丁间歇输注对胃内pH值影响的对照比较
J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Dec;33(12):1219-24. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb03923.x.
3
Comparison of famotidine with cimetidine and ranitidine.法莫替丁与西咪替丁和雷尼替丁的比较。
Clin Pharm. 1988 Apr;7(4):271-84.
4
Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of parenteral histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists.胃肠外组胺(H2)受体拮抗剂的药效学与药代动力学
Am J Med. 1987 Dec 18;83(6A):15-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90806-0.
5
Inhibition of gastric secretion in man with a new H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine.用新型H2受体拮抗剂雷尼替丁抑制人体胃酸分泌。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1980;15(2):249-51. doi: 10.3109/00365528009181464.
6
Overnight comparable anacidity by standard large and half-single bedtime doses of H2 antagonists in duodenal ulcer patients: a clinical pharmacological study.十二指肠溃疡患者睡前服用标准大剂量及半量单次剂量H2拮抗剂实现夜间同等胃酸缺乏:一项临床药理学研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 Sep;83(9):917-22.
7
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine and ranitidine in critically ill children.法莫替丁和雷尼替丁在危重症儿童中的药代动力学和药效学
J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;54(2):201-5. doi: 10.1002/jcph.219. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
8
Achieving pH control in the critically ill patient: the role of continuous infusion of H2-receptor antagonists.在危重症患者中实现pH值控制:持续输注H2受体拮抗剂的作用。
DICP. 1990 Nov;24(11 Suppl):S28-30.
9
[Comparative studies on hemodynamic effects of intravenous cimetidine, ranitidine and famotidine in intensive care unit patients].
Masui. 1987 Jun;36(6):940-7.
10
Comparative efficacy of parenteral histamine (H2)-antagonists in acid suppression for the prevention of stress ulceration.胃肠外组胺(H2)拮抗剂在抑制胃酸以预防应激性溃疡方面的疗效比较
Am J Med. 1987 Dec 18;83(6A):23-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90807-2.

引用本文的文献

1
pH-feedback controlled infusions of ranitidine are no more effective than fixed-dose infusions in reducing gastric acidity and variability in antisecretory responses.在降低胃酸度和抗分泌反应变异性方面,pH值反馈控制的雷尼替丁输注并不比固定剂量输注更有效。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992 May;33(5):487-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04075.x.