Aktaruzzaman M, Migliorini M, Tenhunen M, Himanen S L, Bianchi A M, Sassi R
Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Crema, Italy.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 May;53(5):415-25. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1249-z. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
The work considers automatic sleep stage classification, based on heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, with a focus on the distinction of wakefulness (WAKE) from sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) from non-REM (NREM) sleep. A set of 20 automatically annotated one-night polysomnographic recordings was considered, and artificial neural networks were selected for classification. For each inter-heartbeat (RR) series, beside features previously presented in literature, we introduced a set of four parameters related to signal regularity. RR series of three different lengths were considered (corresponding to 2, 6, and 10 successive epochs, 30 s each, in the same sleep stage). Two sets of only four features captured 99 % of the data variance in each classification problem, and both of them contained one of the new regularity features proposed. The accuracy of classification for REM versus NREM (68.4 %, 2 epochs; 83.8 %, 10 epochs) was higher than when distinguishing WAKE versus SLEEP (67.6 %, 2 epochs; 71.3 %, 10 epochs). Also, the reliability parameter (Cohens's Kappa) was higher (0.68 and 0.45, respectively). Sleep staging classification based on HRV was still less precise than other staging methods, employing a larger variety of signals collected during polysomnographic studies. However, cheap and unobtrusive HRV-only sleep classification proved sufficiently precise for a wide range of applications.
这项工作考虑基于心率变异性(HRV)分析的自动睡眠阶段分类,重点是区分清醒(WAKE)与睡眠,以及快速眼动(REM)与非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠。研究使用了一组20个自动标注的一晚多导睡眠图记录,并选择人工神经网络进行分类。对于每个心跳间期(RR)序列,除了文献中先前提出的特征外,我们还引入了一组与信号规律性相关的四个参数。考虑了三种不同长度的RR序列(分别对应于同一睡眠阶段的2、6和10个连续时段,每个时段30秒)。在每个分类问题中,仅两组四个特征就捕获了99%的数据方差,并且这两组特征都包含所提出的新规律性特征之一。REM与NREM的分类准确率(2个时段时为68.4%,10个时段时为83.8%)高于区分WAKE与SLEEP时的准确率(2个时段时为67.6%,10个时段时为71.3%)。此外,可靠性参数(科恩斯kappa系数)也更高(分别为0.68和0.45)。基于HRV的睡眠分期分类仍不如其他分期方法精确,后者采用了多导睡眠图研究中收集的更多种信号。然而,仅基于HRV的廉价且不引人注意的睡眠分类被证明在广泛的应用中足够精确。