Purser Kelly, Rosenfeld Tuly
J Law Med. 2015 Sep;23(1):121-36.
The need for better and more accurate assessments of testamentary and decision-making capacity grows as Australian society ages and incidences of mentally disabling conditions increase. Capacity is a legal determination, but one on which medical opinion is increasingly being sought. The difficulties inherent within capacity assessments are exacerbated by the ad hoc approaches adopted by legal and medical professionals based on individual knowledge and skill, as well as the numerous assessment paradigms that exist. This can negatively affect the quality of assessments, and results in confusion as to the best way to assess capacity. This article begins by assessing the nature of capacity. The most common general assessment models used in Australia are then discussed, as are the practical challenges associated with capacity assessment. The article concludes by suggesting a way forward to satisfactorily assess legal capacity given the significant ramifications of getting it wrong.
随着澳大利亚社会老龄化以及精神残疾状况发生率的上升,对遗嘱能力和决策能力进行更好、更准确评估的需求也日益增长。能力是一种法律判定,但人们越来越多地寻求医学意见来做出这种判定。基于个人知识和技能所采用的临时方法,以及现存的众多评估范式,加剧了能力评估中固有的困难。这可能会对评估质量产生负面影响,并导致在评估能力的最佳方式上产生混乱。本文首先评估能力的本质。接着讨论澳大利亚最常用的一般评估模型,以及与能力评估相关的实际挑战。鉴于判断失误会产生重大影响,本文最后提出了一种令人满意地评估法律能力的前进方向。