Tran Huong H, Weinberg Janice, Sherman Karen J, Saper Robert B
Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Massachusetts (Dr Tran), United States.
Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts (Dr Weinberg), United States.
Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):34-9. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.066.
In studies involving nonpharmacological complementary and alternative medicine interventions, participant blinding is very difficult. Participant expectations may affect perceived benefit of therapy. In studies of yoga as treatment for chronic low back pain, little is known about the relationship between patient expectations and preferences on outcomes. This study was designed to identify baseline predictors of preference and to determine if expectations and preferences for different doses of yoga affect back-related function and low back pain intensity.
This was a secondary data analysis of a 12-week randomized controlled trial comparing once-weekly vs twice-weekly yoga for treatment of chronic low back pain in 93 adults from a predominantly low-income minority population. At baseline, participants were asked about back function, back pain, treatment expectations, and treatment preferences. We created a variable "concordance" to describe the matching of participant preference to randomized treatment. Our outcome variables were change in back function and pain intensity after 12 weeks of yoga instruction. We performed logistic regression to identify predictors of preference for once- or twice-weekly yoga instruction. We created linear regression models to identify independent associations between expectations, preference, concordance, and outcomes.
Worse back function at baseline was associated with 20% higher odds of preferring twice-weekly yoga (OR 1.2, CI 1.1, 1.3). Individuals with higher expectation scores for twice-weekly yoga had 90% higher odds of preferring twice-weekly vs once-weekly yoga (OR 1.9, CI 1.3, 2.7). Individuals with higher expectation scores for once-weekly yoga had 40% less odds of preferring twice-weekly yoga (OR 0.6, CI 0.5, 0.9). After controlling for baseline characteristics, we found no statistically significant relationship between treatment outcomes, preference, expectation scores, or concordance.
In a population of predominantly low-income minority participants with chronic low back pain, worse back function was associated with preference for more frequent yoga classes. Those who preferred more yoga classes had higher expectations for those classes. Twelve-week change in back pain intensity and back function were not affected by dosing preference, expectation score, or concordance. More research is needed to better measure and quantify preference, expectations, and their relationship to outcomes in yoga research.
在涉及非药物补充和替代医学干预的研究中,使参与者保持盲态非常困难。参与者的期望可能会影响对治疗益处的感知。在瑜伽治疗慢性下腰痛的研究中,对于患者期望与结局偏好之间的关系了解甚少。本研究旨在确定偏好的基线预测因素,并确定对不同剂量瑜伽的期望和偏好是否会影响与背部相关的功能和下腰痛强度。
这是一项对一项为期12周的随机对照试验的二次数据分析,该试验比较了每周一次与每周两次瑜伽对93名主要来自低收入少数族裔人群的成年人慢性下腰痛的治疗效果。在基线时,询问参与者有关背部功能、背痛、治疗期望和治疗偏好。我们创建了一个变量“一致性”来描述参与者偏好与随机治疗的匹配情况。我们的结局变量是在接受12周瑜伽指导后的背部功能和疼痛强度变化。我们进行逻辑回归以确定对每周一次或每周两次瑜伽指导偏好的预测因素。我们创建线性回归模型以确定期望、偏好、一致性和结局之间的独立关联。
基线时背部功能较差与更倾向于每周两次瑜伽的可能性高20%相关(比值比1.2,置信区间1.1, 1.3)。对每周两次瑜伽期望得分较高的个体,相较于每周一次瑜伽,更倾向于每周两次瑜伽的可能性高90%(比值比1.9,置信区间1.3, 2.7)。对每周一次瑜伽期望得分较高的个体,更倾向于每周两次瑜伽的可能性低40%(比值比0.6,置信区间0.5, 0.9)。在控制基线特征后,我们发现治疗结局、偏好、期望得分或一致性之间无统计学显著关系。
在主要为低收入少数族裔的慢性下腰痛参与者群体中,较差的背部功能与更频繁的瑜伽课程偏好相关。那些更喜欢更多瑜伽课程的人对这些课程有更高的期望。背痛强度和背部功能在12周内的变化不受剂量偏好、期望得分或一致性的影响。在瑜伽研究中,需要更多研究来更好地测量和量化偏好、期望及其与结局的关系。