Noyez L, Janssen D P B, Wouters C W, Brouwer R M H J
Neth Heart J. 2005 May;13(5):170-174.
Validation of the EuroSCORE as predictor for a prolonged hospital and intensive care stay after CABG vs. institution-specific scoring systems.
For the evaluation of a prolonged hospital stay, 3359 patients were included in the analysis of EuroSCORE vs. the CORRAD morbidity score. For a prolonged intensive care stay, 1638 patients were included in the analysis of the EuroSCORE vs. the PICUS score.
There was no significant difference in hospital stay between the three different EuroSCORE risk groups. The difference in hospital stay between the high-risk and low-risk groups, identified by the CORRAD morbidity score, was significant (6.9 vs.11.2 days). For a prolonged intensive care stay, the patients identified as high risk by the EuroSCORE and by the PICUS score also had a significantly longer intensive care stay; however, the discriminatory power was low.
The EuroSCORE is not of value as a predictive system for a prolonged hospital stay. There is a relation between the high-risk patients identified by the EuroSCORE and a prolonged intensive care stay.
验证欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)作为冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后住院时间延长及重症监护时间延长的预测指标,并与特定机构的评分系统进行比较。
为评估住院时间延长情况,3359例患者纳入EuroSCORE与CORRAD发病率评分的分析。为评估重症监护时间延长情况,1638例患者纳入EuroSCORE与PICUS评分的分析。
三个不同EuroSCORE风险组之间的住院时间无显著差异。CORRAD发病率评分确定的高风险组和低风险组之间的住院时间差异显著(6.9天对11.2天)。对于重症监护时间延长,EuroSCORE和PICUS评分确定为高风险的患者重症监护时间也显著更长;然而,鉴别能力较低。
EuroSCORE作为预测住院时间延长的系统没有价值。EuroSCORE确定的高风险患者与重症监护时间延长之间存在关联。