• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于反思性写作档案袋的参与模型:脆弱点与适应性行为之间的相互作用。

A model of engagement in reflective writing-based portfolios: Interactions between points of vulnerability and acts of adaptability.

作者信息

Arntfield Shannon, Parlett Brittney, Meston Christine N, Apramian Tavis, Lingard Lorelei

机构信息

a Western University , Canada.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2016;38(2):196-205. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009426. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009426
PMID:25697109
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Portfolios are widely used for meeting new accreditation standards in the age of competency-based medicine. However, the method of learning through portfolio has been suggested to be vulnerable.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore conditions affecting the experience of teaching and learning from the perspective of both students and mentors in a reflective writing-based portfolio initiative.

METHOD

Using mixed-methods rooted in grounded theory, 139 students and 13 mentors completed questionnaires, 23 students participated in four focus groups and 9 mentors in individual interviews.

RESULTS

The overarching theme in our data was student-mentor engagement. Our results confirm previous literature describing portfolio as a vulnerable method of learning, extend this concept by identifying and categorizing specific points of vulnerability, and contribute new knowledge regarding acts of adaptability, which serve to strengthen the student-mentor relationship.

CONCLUSION

Engagement is central to the success of portfolio and is shaped by a dynamic interaction between points of vulnerability and acts of adaptability. We propose a model of engagement in portfolio that can be used for faculty development to optimize student-mentor engagement.

摘要

背景

在基于能力的医学时代,档案袋被广泛用于满足新的认证标准。然而,有人认为通过档案袋学习的方法存在缺陷。

目的

本研究的目的是从基于反思性写作的档案袋计划中的学生和导师的角度,探索影响教学体验的条件。

方法

采用扎根理论的混合方法,139名学生和13名导师完成了问卷调查,23名学生参加了四个焦点小组,9名导师参加了个人访谈。

结果

我们数据中的首要主题是学生与导师的互动。我们的结果证实了之前将档案袋描述为一种有缺陷的学习方法的文献,通过识别和分类具体的缺陷点扩展了这一概念,并贡献了关于适应性行为的新知识,这些行为有助于加强学生与导师的关系。

结论

互动是档案袋成功的核心,它由缺陷点和适应性行为之间的动态相互作用所塑造。我们提出了一个档案袋互动模型,可用于教师发展,以优化学生与导师的互动。

相似文献

1
A model of engagement in reflective writing-based portfolios: Interactions between points of vulnerability and acts of adaptability.基于反思性写作档案袋的参与模型:脆弱点与适应性行为之间的相互作用。
Med Teach. 2016;38(2):196-205. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009426. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
2
Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中成功反思性使用档案袋的条件。
Med Educ. 2005 Dec;39(12):1230-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x.
3
Status of portfolios in undergraduate medical education in the LCME accredited US medical school.美国医学教育联络委员会(LCME)认证的医学院校本科医学教育中的课程组合状况。
Med Teach. 2016 Sep;38(9):886-96. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1114595. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Lessons from medical students' perceptions of learning reflective skills: a multi-institutional study.从医学生对学习反思技能的看法中吸取的教训:一项多机构研究。
Med Teach. 2011;33(10):846-50. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577120. Epub 2011 May 19.
5
Acceptability of a reflective e-portfolio instituted in an orthodontic specialist programme: a pilot study.正畸专科医师培训项目中引入反思型电子档案夹的可接受性:一项试点研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2013 Aug;17(3):177-84. doi: 10.1111/eje.12038. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
6
Web- or paper-based portfolios: is there a difference?基于网络或纸质的档案袋:有区别吗?
Med Educ. 2007 Nov;41(11):1067-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02859.x.
7
Postgraduate Orthodontics Students' and Mentors' Perceptions of Portfolios and Discussion as Tools for Development of Reflection.正畸研究生及导师对档案袋和讨论作为反思发展工具的看法。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Sep;80(9):1098-108.
8
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
9
Use of portfolios in early undergraduate medical training.档案袋在本科医学早期培训中的应用。
Med Teach. 2003 Jan;25(1):18-23. doi: 10.1080/0142159021000061378.
10
Promoting self-directed learning through portfolios in undergraduate medical education: the mentors' perspective.通过本科医学教育中的档案袋来促进自主学习:导师的视角。
Med Teach. 2013;35(2):139-44. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733832. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Discoveries or doubts: a qualitative study of the transformative potential of portfolio meetings.发现或疑惑:对卷宗会议变革潜力的定性研究
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Sep;30(4):1045-1064. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10387-3. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Struggles and Joys: A Mixed Methods Study of the Artefacts and Reflections in Medical Student Portfolios.挣扎与喜悦:医学生档案夹中的人工制品和反思的混合方法研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Jan 5;3(1):1-11. doi: 10.5334/pme.1029. eCollection 2024.
3
Can an authentic EPortfolio succeed in First Year Medicine?
一份真实的电子档案袋在医学一年级能取得成功吗?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Dec 23;8:236. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000236.1. eCollection 2019.
4
Grading reflective essays: the construct validity and reliability of a newly developed Tool- GRE-9.评价反思性文章:新开发的工具-GRE-9 的构建效度和信度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04845-6.
5
Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review.循证方法在医学生和医生的沟通、伦理和专业精神的课程设置和评估中的应用:系统的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e067048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067048.
6
A systematic scoping review of reflective writing in medical education.系统评价医学教育中的反思性写作。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03924-4.
7
Everybody is able to reflect, or aren't they? Evaluating the development of medical professionalism via a longitudinal portfolio mentoring program from a student perspective.每个人都能够进行反思,不是吗?从学生的视角评估纵向组合导师辅导计划对医学职业素养发展的影响。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Feb 15;39(1):Doc12. doi: 10.3205/zma001533. eCollection 2022.
8
Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review.医学生档案袋:一项系统性综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Mar 3;9:23821205221076022. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Construct Validity of an Instrument for Assessment of Reflective Writing-Based Portfolios of Medical Students.医学生基于反思性写作的学习档案袋评估工具的结构效度
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Jun 3;11:397-404. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S256338. eCollection 2020.
10
Multiple-role mentoring: mentors' conceptualisations, enactments and role conflicts.多元角色指导:指导者的概念化、实施和角色冲突。
Med Educ. 2019 Jun;53(6):605-615. doi: 10.1111/medu.13811. Epub 2019 Feb 5.