• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价反思性文章:新开发的工具-GRE-9 的构建效度和信度。

Grading reflective essays: the construct validity and reliability of a newly developed Tool- GRE-9.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Psychology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04845-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04845-6
PMID:37974119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10655370/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study is to assess the construct validity and reliability of the Grading Reflective Essays-9 (GRE-9).

METHODS

This study took place in a major tertiary academic medical center in Beirut, Lebanon. 104 reflective essays written by years 1-3 residents in the department of Family Medicine at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) were graded by 2 trained raters who independently scored the essays using GRE-9. GRE-9 scores were then correlated with scores on communication skills OSCE stations and in-training examinations to investigate, respectively, convergent and divergent validity. One of the 2 raters scored the essays twice one month apart to assess the reliability of the GRE-9 using intra rater reliability and internal consistency.

RESULTS

There was a weak, non-significant correlation between GRE-9 score and In training examination (ITE) score (r = - .213, p = .395). There was a moderate, non-significant correlation between GRE-9 scores and the Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) communication station scores (r = - .412 p = .162). The correlation coefficient between trails 1 and 2 was significant (r = .832, p = .000). Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis demonstrated almost perfect intra-rater agreement (0.819; 95% CI: 0.741-0.875) of the test ratings over time.

CONCLUSIONS

GRE-9, is a short, concise, easy-to-use reliable grading tool for reflective essays that has demonstrated moderate to substantial intra-rater reliability and evidence of divergent validity. The study found non-significant correlations between reflective writing scores OSCE communication scores demonstrating a lack of relationship between reflective writing and this measure of performance.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是评估九级反思性文章评分量表(GRE-9)的结构效度和信度。

方法

本研究在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的一家主要的三级学术医学中心进行。104 篇由贝鲁特美国大学医学中心(AUBMC)家庭医学系 1 至 3 年级住院医师撰写的反思性文章由 2 名经过培训的评分员使用 GRE-9 进行独立评分。然后,将 GRE-9 评分与沟通技能 OSCE 站和在培训考试的评分进行相关分析,以分别调查收敛效度和发散效度。其中一位评分员在一个月后对这些文章进行了两次评分,以使用组内相关系数评估 GRE-9 的信度和内部一致性。

结果

GRE-9 评分与在培训考试(ITE)评分之间存在微弱、无统计学意义的相关性(r = -0.213,p = 0.395)。GRE-9 评分与客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)沟通站评分之间存在中度、无统计学意义的相关性(r = -0.412,p = 0.162)。第一和第二轨迹之间的相关系数具有统计学意义(r = 0.832,p = 0.000)。组内相关系数(ICC)分析表明,测试评分在时间上具有几乎完美的组内一致性(0.819;95%置信区间:0.741-0.875)。

结论

GRE-9 是一种简短、简洁、易于使用的可靠的反思性文章评分工具,具有中等至较大的组内评分者信度,且具有发散效度的证据。研究发现,反思性写作评分与 OSCE 沟通评分之间存在非显著相关性,表明反思性写作与这种表现衡量标准之间缺乏关系。

相似文献

1
Grading reflective essays: the construct validity and reliability of a newly developed Tool- GRE-9.评价反思性文章:新开发的工具-GRE-9 的构建效度和信度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04845-6.
2
Grading reflective essays: the reliability of a newly developed tool- GRE-9.反思性文章评分:一种新开发工具GRE - 9的可靠性
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02213-2.
3
Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.使用反思性写作进行学生评估的考量:可靠性和有效性问题。
Med Educ. 2015 Sep;49(9):901-8. doi: 10.1111/medu.12771.
4
Added value of assessing medical students' reflective writings in communication skills training: a longitudinal study in four academic centres.评估医学生在沟通技巧培训中的反思写作的附加值:四个学术中心的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 6;10(11):e038898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038898.
5
Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.使用新型客观结构化临床考试评估四年级医学生的肌肉骨骼检查技能和诊断推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 14;16(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0780-4.
6
Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection).反思性写作中的批判性思维评估:《卡特助产批判性思维评估(反思)》的开发与测试
Midwifery. 2017 Nov;54:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
7
Can written communication skills be tested in an objective structured clinical examination format?书面沟通技巧能否以客观结构化临床考试的形式进行测试?
Acad Med. 2002 Jan;77(1):82-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200201000-00019.
8
Inter-rater reliability of a reflective rubric to assess pharmacy students' reflective thinking.用于评估药学专业学生反思性思维的反思性评分量表的评分者间信度。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):989-995. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
9
Development and evaluation of the "BRISK Scale," a brief observational measure of risk communication competence.“BRISK量表”的开发与评估,这是一种风险沟通能力的简短观察性测量工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):2091-2094. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
Can a reflective rubric be applied consistently with raters globally? A study across three countries.一个反思性评分标准能在全球范围内被评分者一致应用吗?一项横跨三个国家的研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Oct;11(10):987-994. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Korean version of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire in clinical clerkship of Korean medical students.验证韩国版反思实践问卷在韩国医学生临床实习中的应用。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):153-163. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.256. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Grading reflective essays: the reliability of a newly developed tool- GRE-9.反思性文章评分:一种新开发工具GRE - 9的可靠性
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02213-2.
3
The reliability characteristics of the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective capacity through expressive writing assignments: A replication study.通过表达性写作作业评估反思能力的 REFLECT 量表的可靠性特征:一项复制研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Oct;9(5):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00611-2.
4
The associations between reflective ability and communication skills among medical students.医学生反思能力与沟通技巧的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.028. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Construct Validity of an Instrument for Assessment of Reflective Writing-Based Portfolios of Medical Students.医学生基于反思性写作的学习档案袋评估工具的结构效度
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Jun 3;11:397-404. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S256338. eCollection 2020.
6
Learning to care: medical students' reported value and evaluation of palliative care teaching involving meeting patients and reflective writing.学会关怀:医学生对涉及接触患者及反思性写作的姑息治疗教学的报告价值与评价
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0827-6.
7
A Model for Assessing Reflective Practices in Pharmacy Education.药学教育中反思性实践评估模型
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Oct 25;79(8):124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe798124.
8
Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.使用反思性写作进行学生评估的考量:可靠性和有效性问题。
Med Educ. 2015 Sep;49(9):901-8. doi: 10.1111/medu.12771.
9
Essential steps in developing best practices to assess reflective skill: A comparison of two rubrics.制定评估反思技能的最佳实践的基本步骤:两种评分标准的比较。
Med Teach. 2016;38(1):75-81. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1034662. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
A model of engagement in reflective writing-based portfolios: Interactions between points of vulnerability and acts of adaptability.基于反思性写作档案袋的参与模型:脆弱点与适应性行为之间的相互作用。
Med Teach. 2016;38(2):196-205. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009426. Epub 2015 Sep 4.