Tan Rei, Qi Ting Jacquelin Jia, Zhihao Hong Daniel, Sing Lim Annabelle Jia, Ong Yun Ting, Pisupati Anushka, Xin Chong Eleanor Jia, Chiam Min, Inn Lee Alexia Sze, Shuen Tan Laura Hui, Chew Chin Annelissa Mien, Wijaya Limin, Fong Warren, Radha Krishna Lalit Kumar
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Mar 3;9:23821205221076022. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
Medical Student Portfolios (MSP)s allow medical students to reflect and better appreciate their clinical, research and academic experiences which promotes their individual personal and professional development. However, differences in adoption rate, content design and practice setting create significant variability in their employ. With MSPs increasingly used to evaluate professional competencies and the student's professional identity formation (PIF), this has become an area of concern.
We adopt Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach to carry out a Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) on MSPs. The structured search process of six databases, concurrent use of thematic and content analysis in the Split Approach and comparisons of the themes and categories with the tabulated summaries of included articles in the Jigsaw Perspective and Funnelling Process offers enhanced transparency and reproducibility to this review.
The research team retrieved 14501 abstracts, reviewed 779 full-text articles and included 96 articles. Similarities between the themes, categories and tabulated summaries allowed the identification of the following funnelled domains: Purpose of MSPs, Content and structure of MSPs, Strengths and limitations of MSPs, Methods to improve MSPs, and Use of E-portfolios.
Variability in the employ of MSPs arise as a result of a failure to recognise its different roles and uses. Here we propose additional roles of MSPs, in particular, building on a consistent set of content materials and assessments of milestones called micro-competencies. Whislt generalised micro-competencies assess achievement of general milestones expected of all medical students, personalised micro-competencies record attainment of particular skills, knowledge and attitudes balanced against the medical student's abilities, context and needs. This combination of micro-competencies in a consistent framework promises a holistic, authentic and longitudinal perspective of the medical student's development and maturing PIF.
医学生档案袋(MSP)使医学生能够反思并更好地理解自己的临床、研究和学术经历,从而促进其个人和职业发展。然而,在采用率、内容设计和实践环境方面的差异导致其使用存在显著差异。随着MSP越来越多地用于评估专业能力和学生的职业身份形成(PIF),这已成为一个令人担忧的领域。
我们采用克里希纳基于证据的系统方法,对MSP进行系统范围综述(SEBA中的SSR)。对六个数据库进行结构化搜索,在拆分方法中同时使用主题分析和内容分析,并将主题和类别与拼图视角和漏斗过程中纳入文章的列表摘要进行比较,为本次综述提供了更高的透明度和可重复性。
研究团队检索到14501篇摘要,审查了779篇全文文章,并纳入了96篇文章。主题、类别和列表摘要之间的相似性使得能够确定以下汇总领域:MSP的目的、MSP的内容和结构、MSP的优势和局限性、改进MSP的方法以及电子档案袋的使用。
MSP使用中的差异是由于未能认识到其不同的作用和用途所致。在此,我们提出MSP的其他作用,特别是基于一组一致的内容材料和对称为微能力的里程碑的评估。虽然通用微能力评估所有医学生预期的通用里程碑的达成情况,但个性化微能力记录特定技能、知识和态度的达成情况,并与医学生的能力、背景和需求相平衡。在一个一致的框架中结合这些微能力有望提供医学生发展和成熟的PIF的全面、真实和纵向视角。