Suppr超能文献

[维库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱在内侧松弛中的操作。肌电图与临床结果的比较]

[Vecuronium bromide and succinylcholine procedures in medial relaxation. A comparison of electromyography and clinical findings].

作者信息

Leyser K H, Konietzke D, Hennes H J

机构信息

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1989 Jun;38(6):288-93.

PMID:2569848
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Clinical and electromyographic effects of either succinylcholine (Suc) or vecuronium bromide (VEC) were compared during induction and maintenance of neuromuscular blockade for pelvic laparoscopy.

METHODS

Forty ASA class I and II patients (pat.) were studied under general anesthesia with thiopental, enflurane, and nitrous oxide. Group VEC-pat. (n = 20) received 0.015 mg/kg body wt. VEC as priming and 5 min later 0.085 mg/kg as intubation doses. Repetitive doses of 0.01 mg/kg were injected to maintain twitch depression (T1%) less than or equal to 15%. Neuromuscular block was reversed with atropine and pyridostigmine (0.01 resp. 0.1 mg/kg). In group Suc-pat. relaxation was induced with 1.5 mg/kg Suc 5 min after pretreatment with 2 mg alcuronium. Relaxation (10% less than or equal to T1% less than or equal to 15%) was prolonged using a Suc infusion. Neuromuscular blockade was assessed electromyographically (Relaxograph, Datex) using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation (2 Hz for 2 s). Intubation conditions were scored according to Fahey et al.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with 0.015 mg/kg VEC compared to 2 mg alcuronium led to a more pronounced decline in T1% and TOF-ratio (P less than 0.001). The time interval between injection of the intubation dose and complete relaxation (T1% less than or equal to 5%) was shorter in group Suc- than in VEC-pat. (P less than 0.001). Suc provides better intubation conditions than VEC (P less than 0.05). Recovery from muscle relaxation was faster in Suc- than in VEC-pat. (P less than 0.001). During Suc infusion in 8 patients a phase-II block (TOF ratio less than or equal to 30%) was observed.

DISCUSSION

Postoperative problems are often related to an unrecognized after effects of relaxants. Suc infusion leads to a remarkable number of phase-II blocks, whereas VEC can be antagonized promptly.

摘要

未标注

在盆腔腹腔镜检查的神经肌肉阻滞诱导和维持过程中,比较了琥珀酰胆碱(Suc)或溴化维库溴铵(VEC)的临床和肌电图效应。

方法

40例ASA I级和II级患者在硫喷妥钠、恩氟烷和氧化亚氮全身麻醉下进行研究。VEC组患者(n = 20)静脉注射0.015 mg/kg体重的VEC作为预充量,5分钟后注射0.085 mg/kg作为插管剂量。重复注射0.01 mg/kg以维持颤搐抑制(T1%)小于或等于15%。用阿托品和新斯的明(分别为0.01和0.1 mg/kg)逆转神经肌肉阻滞。在Suc组患者中,在预先给予2 mg阿库氯铵5分钟后,静脉注射1.5 mg/kg Suc诱导肌肉松弛。通过输注Suc延长肌肉松弛时间(10%≤T1%≤15%)。使用四个成串刺激(TOF)(2 Hz,持续2秒)通过肌电图(Relaxograph,Datex)评估神经肌肉阻滞。根据Fahey等人的方法对插管条件进行评分。

结果

与2 mg阿库氯铵相比,0.015 mg/kg VEC预充后T1%和TOF比率下降更明显(P < 0.001)。Suc组患者从注射插管剂量到完全松弛(T1%≤5%)的时间间隔比VEC组短(P < 0.001)。Suc提供的插管条件优于VEC(P < 0.05)。Suc组患者肌肉松弛恢复比VEC组快(P < 0.001)。在8例患者输注Suc期间,观察到II期阻滞(TOF比率≤30%)。

讨论

术后问题通常与未被识别的肌松药后遗症有关。输注Suc会导致相当数量的II期阻滞,而VEC可以迅速被拮抗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验