Krans Julie, de Bree June, Moulds Michelle L
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Behavior, Health and Psychopathology Research Group, University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen , Netherlands.
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 2;6:7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00007. eCollection 2015.
Psychological research into spontaneous or intrusive cognitions has typically focused on cognitions in one predefined domain, such as obsessional thoughts in OCD, intrusive memories in posttraumatic stress disorder and depression, or involuntary autobiographical memories and daydreaming in everyday life. Such studies have resulted in a wealth of knowledge about these specific cognitions. However, by focusing on a predefined type of cognition, other subtypes of cognition that may co-occur can be missed. In this exploratory study, we aimed to assess involuntary cognitions in everyday life without a pre-determined focus on any specific subtype of cognition. Seventy unselected undergraduate student participants were administered a questionnaire that assessed the presence of any involuntary cognitions in the past month, their quality, type, content, and potential function. In addition, participants provided self-descriptions and completed measures of psychopathology. Content analyses showed that involuntary cognitions were common, predominantly visual in nature, emotional, often about social relationships, and often related to a hypothetical function of emotional processing. About two-thirds of the cognitions that participants reported were memories. Non-memories included daydreams, imaginary worst case scenarios, imaginary future events, hypothetical reconstructions, and ruminations. Memories and non-memories were strikingly similar in their subjective experience of content and emotionality. Negative (but not positive) self-descriptions were associated with negative involuntary cognitions and psychopathology, suggesting a link between involuntary cognitions and the self. Overall, the findings suggest that people experience a wide variety of subtypes of involuntary cognitions in everyday life. Moreover, the specific subtype of involuntary cognition appears to be less important than its valence or content, at least to the subjective experience of the individual.
对自发或侵入性认知的心理学研究通常聚焦于一个预先定义的领域中的认知,比如强迫症中的强迫观念、创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症中的侵入性记忆,或者日常生活中的非自愿自传体记忆和白日梦。这类研究已经产生了关于这些特定认知的丰富知识。然而,通过聚焦于一种预先定义的认知类型,可能会遗漏同时出现的其他认知亚型。在这项探索性研究中,我们旨在评估日常生活中的非自愿认知,而不预先确定关注任何特定的认知亚型。70名未经挑选的本科学生参与者填写了一份问卷,该问卷评估了过去一个月中任何非自愿认知的存在情况、其性质、类型、内容和潜在功能。此外,参与者提供了自我描述并完成了精神病理学测量。内容分析表明,非自愿认知很常见,主要是视觉性的、情绪化的,通常与社会关系有关,并且常常与情绪加工的一种假设功能相关。参与者报告的认知中约三分之二是记忆。非记忆包括白日梦、想象中的最坏情况、想象中的未来事件、假设性重构和沉思。记忆和非记忆在内容和情绪的主观体验上惊人地相似。消极(而非积极)的自我描述与消极的非自愿认知和精神病理学相关,这表明非自愿认知与自我之间存在联系。总体而言,研究结果表明人们在日常生活中会经历各种各样的非自愿认知亚型。此外,非自愿认知的具体亚型似乎不如其效价或内容重要,至少对于个体的主观体验来说是这样。