Suppr超能文献

LigaSure与橡皮筋结扎术在大鼠急性阑尾炎模型中闭合发炎盲肠残端的比较及疗效

Comparison and efficacy of LigaSure and rubber band ligature in closing the inflamed cecal stump in a rat model of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Yeh Chun-Chieh, Jan Chia-Ing, Yang Horng-Ren, Huang Po-Han, Jeng Long-Bin, Su Wen-Pang, Chen Hui-Chen

机构信息

School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan ; Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan ; Division of Transplantation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Department of Pathology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan ; Department of Pathology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin 65152, Taiwan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:260312. doi: 10.1155/2015/260312. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Abstract

Safety of either LigaSure or rubber band in closing inflamed appendiceal stump in acute appendicitis has been less investigated. In this study, cecal ligation followed by resecting inflamed cecum was performed to mimic appendectomy in a rat model of acute appendicitis. Rats were sacrificed immediately (Group A) and 7 days (Group B) after cecal resection, respectively. The cecal stumps were closed by silk ligature (S), 5 mm LigaSure (L), or rubber band (R). Seven days after cecal resection, the LigaSure (BL) and silk subgroups (BS) had significantly less intra-abdominal adhesion and better laparotomy wound healing than rubber band subgroup (BR). The initial bursting pressure at cecal stump was comparable among the three methods; along with tissue healing process, both BL and BS provided a higher bursting pressure than BR 7 days after appendectomy. BL subgroup had more abundant hydroxyproline deposition than BS and BR subgroup. Furthermore, serum TNF-α in BR group kept persistently increasing along with time after cecal resection. Thus, the finding that LigaSure but not rubber band is safe in sealing off the inflamed cecal stump in rat model of acute appendicitis suggests the possibility of applying LigaSure for appendectomy via single port procedure or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

摘要

在急性阑尾炎中,使用血管闭合系统(LigaSure)或橡皮筋闭合发炎阑尾残端的安全性研究较少。在本研究中,采用盲肠结扎后切除发炎盲肠的方法,在大鼠急性阑尾炎模型中模拟阑尾切除术。分别在盲肠切除后即刻(A组)和7天(B组)处死大鼠。盲肠残端分别用丝线结扎(S)、5毫米血管闭合系统(L)或橡皮筋(R)进行闭合。盲肠切除7天后,血管闭合系统组(BL)和丝线结扎亚组(BS)的腹腔内粘连明显少于橡皮筋亚组(BR),剖腹伤口愈合也更好。三种方法的盲肠残端初始破裂压力相当;随着组织愈合过程,阑尾切除术后7天,血管闭合系统组和丝线结扎亚组的破裂压力均高于橡皮筋亚组。血管闭合系统亚组的羟脯氨酸沉积比丝线结扎亚组和橡皮筋亚组更丰富。此外,橡皮筋组血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)在盲肠切除后随时间持续升高。因此,在大鼠急性阑尾炎模型中,血管闭合系统而非橡皮筋在封闭发炎盲肠残端时是安全的,这一发现提示了血管闭合系统应用于单孔手术或经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)阑尾切除术的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4d/4324495/3e3ae3fa3fe3/BMRI2015-260312.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验