• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

困难阑尾残端的处理:我的做法。

Management of the difficult appendiceal stump: how I do it.

作者信息

Poole G V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1993 Sep;59(9):624-5.

PMID:8368672
Abstract

The appendix can usually be removed by the standard technique of stump ligation after transection, with or without inversion of the stump into the base of the cecum. When inflammation or necrosis extends into the cecum and the appendix cannot be ligated at its base, there are several options that can be employed. These include appendicocecostomy, partial cecal excision with a stapling instrument, and right colon resection. These techniques have been used 16 times in 249 patients operated upon for appendicitis. Although these techniques will be required infrequently, when they are necessary the risk of appendiceal stump breakdown with peritoneal soilage or cecal fistula can be minimized.

摘要

阑尾通常可通过切断后残端结扎的标准技术切除,残端可翻转至盲肠底部,也可不翻转。当炎症或坏死蔓延至盲肠,无法在阑尾根部结扎时,有几种方法可供选择。这些方法包括阑尾盲肠吻合术、用吻合器进行部分盲肠切除以及右半结肠切除术。在249例接受阑尾炎手术的患者中,这些技术共使用了16次。尽管这些技术不常需要,但必要时可将阑尾残端破裂伴腹膜污染或盲肠瘘的风险降至最低。

相似文献

1
Management of the difficult appendiceal stump: how I do it.困难阑尾残端的处理:我的做法。
Am Surg. 1993 Sep;59(9):624-5.
2
A comparison of the simple ligation and ligation inversion of the appendiceal stump after appendectomy.
Chir Ital. 1991 Oct-Dec;43(5-6):206-10.
3
Stump appendicitis.残端阑尾炎
Am Surg. 2000 Aug;66(8):739-41.
4
Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy.阑尾切除术中单纯结扎与残端内翻术的比较
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1996;85(3):222-4.
5
Comparison and efficacy of LigaSure and rubber band ligature in closing the inflamed cecal stump in a rat model of acute appendicitis.LigaSure与橡皮筋结扎术在大鼠急性阑尾炎模型中闭合发炎盲肠残端的比较及疗效
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:260312. doi: 10.1155/2015/260312. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
6
[Simple ligation superior to inversion of the appendiceal stump; a prospective randomized study].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992 May 23;136(21):1020-3.
7
Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study.对于伴有阑尾包块的急性阑尾炎患儿,早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jul;40(7):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.046.
8
Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy.
Arch Surg. 1988 Jun;123(6):689-90. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300031003.
9
Comparison of bipolar electrosurgical devices with ligatures and endoclips in the rat appendicitis model.比较在大鼠阑尾炎模型中使用双极电外科设备与结扎和内镜夹的效果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Oct;46(10):1923-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.04.062.
10
Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure.阑尾残端闭合中吻合器与Endoloop的对比分析。
Br J Surg. 2006 Nov;93(11):1390-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5474.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial cecum resection using endostapler in acute complicated appendicitis with appendiceal base necrosis.在急性复杂性阑尾炎伴阑尾根部坏死时使用腔内吻合器行部分盲肠切除术。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):143-149. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105574. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Endoloop versus endostapler: what is the best option for appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis? Results of a multicentric international survey.Endoloop 与 endostapler:在儿童复杂性阑尾炎中,阑尾残端闭合的最佳选择是什么?一项多中心国际调查的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3570-3575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6081-8. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
3
Appendectomy and resection of the terminal ileum with secondary severe necrotic changes in acute perforated appendicitis.
急性穿孔性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术及末端回肠切除术,伴有继发性严重坏死改变。
Am J Case Rep. 2015 Jan 25;16:37-40. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.892471.
4
Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜治疗穿孔性阑尾炎。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14338-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14338.