Scherr S, Steinleitner A
Institut für Kommunikationswissenschaft und Medienforschung, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Oettingenstr. 67, 80538, München, Deutschland,
Nervenarzt. 2015 May;86(5):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s00115-015-4260-6.
Research on the impact of suicide depictions in the media is traditionally focussed on two possible outcomes: on the one hand, there is ample evidence for additional copycat effects after media coverage of suicides referred to as the Werther effect but on the other hand, suicide rates decrease after appropriate media depictions of suicides referred to as the Papageno effect. It is still uncertain what exactly qualifies studies that only limitedly support an imitative or preventive media effect, i.e. studies with ambiguous findings, as they are often disregarded. The present literature review focuses on equivocal studies (n = 25) on copycat suicides that were systematically analyzed based on theoretically derived criteria. The results of the systematic analysis of all identified studies imply that media effects on suicidality are better understood and discussed as a continuum between the two extremes that were introduced as either a damaging Werther effect or a beneficial Papageno effect. Future studies must clarify what factors contribute to a shift from ambiguous findings to harmful media effects on individual suicidality.
传统上,关于媒体中自杀描述的影响的研究主要集中在两种可能的结果上:一方面,有充分的证据表明,媒体对自杀事件进行报道后会产生额外的模仿效应,即所谓的“维特效应”;但另一方面,在对自杀事件进行适当的媒体描述后,自杀率会下降,即所谓的“帕帕盖诺效应”。目前仍不确定究竟哪些研究仅有限地支持模仿或预防媒体效应,即那些结果不明确的研究,因为它们常常被忽视。本综述聚焦于对25项关于模仿自杀的结果不明确的研究,这些研究是基于理论推导的标准进行系统分析的。对所有已识别研究的系统分析结果表明,媒体对自杀倾向的影响,作为介于两种极端情况(即要么是有害的维特效应,要么是有益的帕帕盖诺效应)之间的一个连续体,能得到更好的理解和讨论。未来的研究必须阐明,哪些因素会导致研究结果从不明确转变为对个体自杀倾向产生有害的媒体效应。