McCane Lynn M, Heckman Susan M, McFarland Dennis J, Townsend George, Mak Joseph N, Sellers Eric W, Zeitlin Debra, Tenteromano Laura M, Wolpaw Jonathan R, Vaughan Theresa M
Laboratory of Neural Injury and Repair, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA; Helen Hayes Rehabilitation Hospital, New York State Department of Health, West Haverstraw, NY, USA.
Laboratory of Neural Injury and Repair, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA; Helen Hayes Rehabilitation Hospital, New York State Department of Health, West Haverstraw, NY, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;126(11):2124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aimed at restoring communication to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities often use event-related potentials (ERPs) in scalp-recorded EEG activity. Up to the present, most research and development in this area has been done in the laboratory with young healthy control subjects. In order to facilitate the development of BCI most useful to people with disabilities, the present study set out to: (1) determine whether people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and healthy, age-matched volunteers (HVs) differ in the speed and accuracy of their ERP-based BCI use; (2) compare the ERP characteristics of these two groups; and (3) identify ERP-related factors that might enable improvement in BCI performance for people with disabilities.
Sixteen EEG channels were recorded while people with ALS or healthy age-matched volunteers (HVs) used a P300-based BCI. The subjects with ALS had little or no remaining useful motor control (mean ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised 9.4 (±9.5SD) (range 0-25)). Each subject attended to a target item as the items in a 6×6 visual matrix flashed. The BCI used a stepwise linear discriminant function (SWLDA) to determine the item the user wished to select (i.e., the target item). Offline analyses assessed the latencies, amplitudes, and locations of ERPs to the target and non-target items for people with ALS and age-matched control subjects.
BCI accuracy and communication rate did not differ significantly between ALS users and HVs. Although ERP morphology was similar for the two groups, their target ERPs differed significantly in the location and amplitude of the late positivity (P300), the amplitude of the early negativity (N200), and the latency of the late negativity (LN).
The differences in target ERP components between people with ALS and age-matched HVs are consistent with the growing recognition that ALS may affect cortical function. The development of BCIs for use by this population may begin with studies in HVs but also needs to include studies in people with ALS. Their differences in ERP components may affect the selection of electrode montages, and might also affect the selection of presentation parameters (e.g., matrix design, stimulation rate).
P300-based BCI performance in people severely disabled by ALS is similar to that of age-matched control subjects. At the same time, their ERP components differ to some degree from those of controls. Attention to these differences could contribute to the development of BCIs useful to those with ALS and possibly to others with severe neuromuscular disabilities.
旨在帮助严重神经肌肉残疾患者恢复沟通能力的脑机接口(BCI)通常利用头皮记录的脑电图(EEG)活动中的事件相关电位(ERP)。到目前为止,该领域的大多数研发工作都是在实验室中针对年轻健康的对照受试者进行的。为了促进对残疾人士最有用的BCI的开发,本研究旨在:(1)确定肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者与年龄匹配的健康志愿者(HV)在基于ERP的BCI使用速度和准确性方面是否存在差异;(2)比较这两组的ERP特征;(3)确定可能有助于改善残疾人士BCI性能的与ERP相关的因素。
在ALS患者或年龄匹配的健康志愿者(HV)使用基于P300的BCI时,记录16个EEG通道。ALS患者几乎没有或完全没有剩余的有效运动控制能力(ALS功能评定量表修订版平均为9.4(±9.5标准差)(范围0 - 25))。当一个6×6视觉矩阵中的项目闪烁时,每个受试者关注一个目标项目。BCI使用逐步线性判别函数(SWLDA)来确定用户希望选择的项目(即目标项目)。离线分析评估了ALS患者和年龄匹配的对照受试者对目标和非目标项目的ERP潜伏期、振幅和位置。
ALS用户和HV之间的BCI准确性和沟通速率没有显著差异。虽然两组的ERP形态相似,但他们的目标ERP在晚期正波(P300)的位置和振幅、早期负波(N200)的振幅以及晚期负波(LN)的潜伏期方面存在显著差异。
ALS患者与年龄匹配的HV之间目标ERP成分的差异与越来越多的认识一致,即ALS可能影响皮层功能。为该人群开发的BCI可能首先从针对HV的研究开始,但也需要包括针对ALS患者的研究。他们在ERP成分上的差异可能会影响电极蒙太奇的选择,也可能会影响呈现参数(如矩阵设计、刺激速率)的选择。
基于P300的BCI在因ALS而严重残疾的人群中的表现与年龄匹配的对照受试者相似。同时,他们的ERP成分在一定程度上与对照组不同。关注这些差异可能有助于开发对ALS患者以及可能对其他严重神经肌肉残疾患者有用的BCI。