Schaefer E, Drexler H, Kiesel J
Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung, Erlangen.
Institutsleiter, Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Erlangen.
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Mar;78(3):161-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396887. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
The aim of this study was to gain insight into worksite health promotion in small and medium-sized companies compared to large concerns in Middle Franconia. Action in worksite health promotion, obstacles and demand for networks for workplace health promotion were determined.
A standardised telephone interview served for collecting data for this cross-sectional study. The interviewee was always the manager or their proxy. 106 companies were contacted. The results of this study were analysed via qualitative and quantitative methods in SPSS(®) 20.
It was possible to reach and interview 80 companies, a return rate of 75.5%. More than half the companies (68.8%) implemented at least one activity for worksite health promotion, especially ergonomic measures and measures to promote physical activity. Taking the size of the company into consideration when analysing the results, previous study results are confirmed. With an increasing size of the company, the relative frequency of measures for workplace health promotion rises. The motivation for worksite health promotion ranges from keeping the employees healthy (38.2%) to worksite health promotion as part of the business culture (9.1%). 81.1% of the companies consider their activity in worksite health promotion to be successful. Furthermore, 80.0% of the firms that implemented worksite health promotion were supported by a partner like a health insurance (43.2%). Those companies that did not implement any activities for worksite health promotion, state as a prime reason that they did not think about it as yet (44.0%). Besides, 44.0% of the companies without any worksite health promotion would like to implement measures. 65.5% of the companies that already took action in worksite health promotion and 56.0% of the companies that did not would like to cooperate with other firms in a network for workplace health promotion. Mutual exchange is the most important factor for them.
The results of this study show that almost half of the companies that did not implement measures for worksite health promotion as yet would like to take action in this regard. For a bigger establishment of worksite health promotion, networks are predestinated and are best accompanied and supported by external professionals like health insurances, mutual indemnity associations or universities.
本研究旨在深入了解中弗兰肯地区中小企业与大型企业相比的工作场所健康促进情况。确定了工作场所健康促进的行动、障碍以及对工作场所健康促进网络的需求。
采用标准化电话访谈收集该横断面研究的数据。受访者始终是经理或其代理人。联系了106家公司。本研究结果通过SPSS(®) 20中的定性和定量方法进行分析。
成功联系并访谈了80家公司,回复率为75.5%。超过半数的公司(68.8%)实施了至少一项工作场所健康促进活动,特别是人体工程学措施和促进身体活动的措施。在分析结果时考虑公司规模,证实了先前的研究结果。随着公司规模的增加,工作场所健康促进措施的相对频率上升。工作场所健康促进的动机范围从保持员工健康(38.2%)到将工作场所健康促进作为企业文化的一部分(9.1%)。81.1%的公司认为其工作场所健康促进活动是成功的。此外,实施工作场所健康促进的公司中有80.0%得到了诸如健康保险等合作伙伴的支持(43.2%)。那些未实施任何工作场所健康促进活动的公司,将其主要原因归结为他们尚未考虑过(44.0%)。此外,44.0%没有任何工作场所健康促进措施的公司希望实施相关措施。65.5%已经采取工作场所健康促进行动的公司以及56.0%尚未采取行动的公司希望在工作场所健康促进网络中与其他公司合作。相互交流对他们来说是最重要的因素。
本研究结果表明,几乎一半尚未实施工作场所健康促进措施的公司希望在这方面采取行动。为了更广泛地开展工作场所健康促进,网络是注定要发展的,并且最好由健康保险、相互赔偿协会或大学等外部专业人员陪伴和支持。