Suppr超能文献

德国工作场所健康促进模式项目——沟通流程、信息传递以及所提供措施的参与度不高的原因。

A German Model Project for Workplace Health Promotion-Flow of Communication, Information, and Reasons for Non-Participation in the Offered Measures.

机构信息

Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Henkestraße 9-11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Department for Public Health, Health Services Research and HTA, UMIT-Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8122. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138122.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workplace health promotion (WHP) as a part of workplace health management (WHM) was strengthened in German legislature with the Prevention Act of 2015. However, smaller enterprises often do not offer WHM or WHP. Accordingly, a model-project for improving the uptake and implementation, particularly in micro-, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) was carried out. The aim of the study was to determine reasons for non-participation in WHP offers and analyze communication issues, both from the employee's and employer's perspective.

METHODS

In total, 21 managers or persons responsible for WHP participated in the first online survey between March and April 2020, and 156 employees responded to the second online survey between June and October 2021. The importance of barriers and communication issues was investigated. Based on a principal component analysis on non-participation, differences regarding sociodemographic variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most employees knew about the offered measures and that the measures were cost free. There was no significant association between having communicated the offers to the employees and considering them suitable for their needs. Most of the managers or persons responsible for WHP rated the measures as sufficiently varied and allowed staff to take part during working-time. Reasons for non-participation from the managers' point of view were travel time to the location of the offers, lack of time, and a missing fit between offers and employees' needs. From the employees' point of view, workload (including working time) was the main barrier to participation.

CONCLUSIONS

For the practical implementation of model projects in MSMEs, special attention should be paid to ensuring opportunity to participate, which may be easier with in-house offers.

摘要

背景

2015 年的《预防法》加强了工作场所健康促进(WHP)作为工作场所健康管理(WHM)的一部分。然而,小企业通常不提供 WHM 或 WHP。因此,开展了一项改善采用和实施的示范项目,特别是在微型、小型和中型企业(MSMEs)中。本研究的目的是确定不参与 WHP 提供的原因,并从员工和雇主的角度分析沟通问题。

方法

共有 21 名经理或负责 WHP 的人员参加了 2020 年 3 月至 4 月之间的第一次在线调查,156 名员工参加了 2021 年 6 月至 10 月之间的第二次在线调查。调查了障碍和沟通问题的重要性。基于非参与的主成分分析,分析了社会人口统计学变量的差异。

结果

大多数员工了解所提供的措施,并且这些措施是免费的。向员工传达这些措施与认为这些措施适合他们的需求之间没有显著关联。大多数经理或负责 WHP 的人员认为这些措施变化足够大,并允许员工在工作时间参加。从经理的角度来看,不参与的原因是前往提供地点的交通时间、缺乏时间和提供的措施与员工需求之间不匹配。从员工的角度来看,工作量(包括工作时间)是参与的主要障碍。

结论

为了在 MSMEs 中实际实施示范项目,应特别注意确保参与机会,这在提供内部措施时可能更容易。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验