Suppr超能文献

关于美国食品药品监督管理局对直接面向消费者的基因检测发出警告的思考。

Reflections on the US FDA's Warning on Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.

作者信息

Yim Seon-Hee, Chung Yeun-Jun

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Integrated Research Center for Genome Polymorphism, MRC, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea.

Department of Microbiology, Integrated Research Center for Genome Polymorphism, MRC, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea.

出版信息

Genomics Inform. 2014 Dec;12(4):151-5. doi: 10.5808/GI.2014.12.4.151. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

Abstract

In November 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent a warning letter to 23andMe, Inc. and ordered the company to discontinue marketing of the 23andMe Personal Genome Service (PGS) until it receives FDA marketing authorization for the device. The FDA considers the PGS as an unclassified medical device, which requires premarket approval or de novo classification. Opponents of the FDA's action expressed their concerns, saying that the FDA is overcautious and paternalistic, which violates consumers' rights and might stifle the consumer genomics field itself, and insisted that the agency should not restrict direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing without empirical evidence of harm. Proponents support the agency's action as protection of consumers from potentially invalid and almost useless information. This action was also significant, since it reflected the FDA's attitude towards medical application of next-generation sequencing techniques. In this review, we followed up on the FDA-23andMe incident and evaluated the problems and prospects for DTC genetic testing.

摘要

2013年11月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)向23andMe公司发出警告信,责令该公司停止23andMe个人基因组服务(PGS)的营销,直至其获得该设备的FDA营销授权。FDA将PGS视为未分类的医疗器械,这需要上市前批准或重新分类。FDA这一行动的反对者表达了他们的担忧,称FDA过于谨慎且家长式作风,这侵犯了消费者权利,可能会阻碍消费者基因组学领域本身的发展,并坚称该机构在没有伤害的实证证据的情况下,不应限制直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测。支持者支持该机构的行动,认为这是在保护消费者免受潜在无效且几乎无用的信息的影响。这一行动也具有重要意义,因为它反映了FDA对下一代测序技术医学应用的态度。在本综述中,我们追踪了FDA-23andMe事件,并评估了DTC基因检测的问题和前景。

相似文献

10
Public perceptions of the FDA's marketing authorization of Vuse on Twitter/X.公众对 FDA 批准 Vuse 在 Twitter/X 上营销的看法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1280658. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1280658. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Updating the landscape of direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing.更新面向消费者的药物基因组检测的局面。
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2017 Aug 22;10:229-232. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S140461. eCollection 2017.
2
Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration.原始基因数据的第三方解读:一项伦理探索
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov;25(11):1189-1194. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.126. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Making Meaningful Clinical Use of Biomarkers.实现生物标志物的有意义临床应用。
Biomark Insights. 2017 Jun 19;12:1177271917715236. doi: 10.1177/1177271917715236. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

4
Just the facts, please.请只讲事实。
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Dec;31(12):1075-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2771.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验