Suppr超能文献

健康经济学、公平与效率:我们快达成目标了吗?

Health economics, equity, and efficiency: are we almost there?

作者信息

Ferraz Marcos Bosi

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ; São Paulo Center for Health Economics (GRIDES), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Feb 12;7:119-22. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S78093. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Health care is a highly complex, dynamic, and creative sector of the economy. While health economics has to continue its efforts to improve its methods and tools to better inform decisions, the application needs to be aligned with the insights and models of other social sciences disciplines. Decisions may be guided by four concept models based on ethical and distributive justice: libertarian, communitarian, egalitarian, and utilitarian. The societal agreement on one model or a defined mix of models is critical to avoid inequity and unfair decisions in a public and/or private insurance-based health care system. The excess use of methods and tools without fully defining the basic goals and philosophical principles of the health care system and without evaluating the fitness of these measures to reaching these goals may not contribute to an efficient improvement of population health.

摘要

医疗保健是经济中一个高度复杂、动态且富有创造性的部门。虽然卫生经济学必须继续努力改进其方法和工具,以便为决策提供更好的信息,但应用需要与其他社会科学学科的见解和模型保持一致。决策可能由基于伦理和分配正义的四种概念模型指导:自由主义、社群主义、平等主义和功利主义。社会就一种模型或特定的模型组合达成一致,对于避免基于公共和/或私人保险的医疗保健系统中出现不公平和不公正的决策至关重要。在没有充分界定医疗保健系统的基本目标和哲学原则,也没有评估这些措施是否适合实现这些目标的情况下,过度使用方法和工具可能无助于有效改善人群健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e3b/4334313/5de24b115c43/ceor-7-119Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验