Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista e Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ; São Paulo Center for Health Economics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil ; GRIDES, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 740, São Paulo, 04023-062 Brazil.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015 May 1;13:8. doi: 10.1186/s12962-015-0035-y. eCollection 2015.
The exponential increase of knowledge in the life sciences field, more specifically in health sciences, in the past few years has brought additional levels of complexity when deciding and implementing strategies in the health care system. A predominantly paternalistic way to decide about available options to maintain or improve individual or collective health has been moving to a shared-decision model considering the empowered patient. In spite of the reduction of uncertainty when making health and health care decisions due to the advancement in scientific methods, and, in spite of the asymmetry of information, knowledge and power to make decisions, we are progressively recognizing the importance of individuals, the target of the intervention, to express their preferences and to take an active role in the decision making process. Health care stakeholders, recognizing the scarcity of resources available and the fortunate ever increasing amount of applicable knowledge and its corresponding interventions to improve the population quantity and quality of life, should stimulate society to address and discuss health care issues that will guide critical choices and define health care priorities based mostly on judgment and the best evidence available.
近年来,生命科学领域,尤其是健康科学领域的知识呈指数级增长,这使得在医疗保健系统中决策和实施策略的复杂性增加了。在决定维持或改善个人或集体健康的可用选择时,主要采取的是一种家长式的决策方法,现在正在向考虑到赋权患者的共同决策模式转变。尽管由于科学方法的进步,在做出健康和医疗保健决策时减少了不确定性,并且尽管在做出决策时存在信息、知识和权力的不对称,但我们越来越认识到干预目标人群的重要性,他们应该表达自己的偏好,并在决策过程中发挥积极作用。医疗保健利益相关者认识到可用资源的稀缺性以及幸运的是,可用知识及其相应的干预措施不断增加,以提高人口的数量和生活质量,他们应该鼓励社会解决和讨论医疗保健问题,这些问题将指导关键选择,并基于判断和最佳现有证据来确定医疗保健重点。